HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| diagram | 1.4K | 1.9K |
| 72 | 859 | 1K |
-
Moving forward :/Okkkayyy. So. I just wrote #72 and received a 160, which is on the lower end of my scoring, as I have found I typically score in the mid-160s. The 4t…
Okkkayyy. So. I just wrote #72 and received a 160, which ... -
pt 72 section3 q12The video explanation was a bit murky here. I'm not so sure why the answer choice is C. I have a good theory on why people likely mistakenly pick C…
The video explanation was a bit murky here. I'm not so sure why the answer choice is C. I have a good theory on why people likely mistakenly pick C even though it is the right a/c. There are some issues I have with it.
1. its trying to say that ... -
"Since" necessary or sufficient condition?I know this is probably a rookie question, but I require an expert answer. So how do we diagram since? I don't recall it in the lessons. I have reaso…
... answer. So how do we diagram since? I don't recall ... -
I did not expect thatWell I hit the weird game in PT 72 and all of my confidence got sucked out of me. I have been able to get the old games and the new games without an…
... the weird game in PT 72 and all of my confidence ... just felt off with the 72 logic games and now my ... -
Is this Burnout? What do I do?Hey Guys, I know that this topic has been beaten to a pulp but I thought that I probably couldn't hurt to write it again (to at least help me feel…
... to read the RC for 72, I was blanking. Didn't ... -
buying PTsHey just wondering where some of you bought all of the PTs. On Amazon they sell them in mini bundles. For example, PTs 4-14 and 7-16 etc. However…
... . So you can buy all 72 of them together. I want ... -
Last minute dilemma withdraw*please don't quote i am in a dilemma regarding whether to take the test this Saturday. i had been scoring at my target of 173 in the retakes of t…
... lg section.
pt 72: -18, 166, rc -9, lr1 ... -
37-3-3I'm stumped on 18. I set my diagram up to have my shelves numbered horizontically and JY sets his up vertically. I got all of the other questions rig…
... on 18. I set my diagram up to have my shelves ... other questions right and my diagram is just wrong for this ... that I set up my diagram? My diagram is ok? I'm ... the 3rd shelf with my diagram. -
51.3.21 Most opera singersI don't see how E is MSS supported. Can someone evaluate my reasoning? Here was my diagram: Opera singers with demanding roles at young age MOS…
... ?
Here was my diagram:
Opera singers with demanding ... -
PT59 S2 Q19As far as I remember about conditional reasoning, if: 1. A-> B 2. C-> ~A I can combine 1 and 2 (~B-> ~A: Contrapositive #1 and C-> ~A) and tu…
... ; ~B.
So the diagram about the stimulus I thought ... -
PT difficulty?This has probably already been hashed out somewhere, BUT, I can't find it, so... Is there somewhere on 7sage (or elsewhere) that ranks the difficu…
... example, I just took PT 72 this evening. I want to ... />
I'm hoping PT 72 is considered "hard" compared to ... -
PT plans until December LSATHi, this is the first time writing anything on the board, so I'm a bit nervous, so bear with me. I am preparing for December LSAT. Last week, I hav…
... taking fresh set of 71, 72, and 73 at the end ... -
PT17.3.14 Many artists claim that...Can someone help me diagram the stimulus and find the sufficient assumption? What I have is: P: art criticism most /satisfy ---- C: art critic…
Can someone help me diagram the stimulus and find the ... -
How do you diagram this?I've been reading the LSAT trainer and am a little confused about the diagramming of the bi-conditional. One question was: L will go before J if …
I've been reading the LSAT trainer and am a little confused about the diagramming of the bi-conditional.
One question was: L will go before J if and only if L is after G. I diagrammed this as follows: L--J G---L--J. However, the answer ... -
This is so confusing, please help!I don't know if I'm overthinking it, or the diagrams truly represent different ideas. Logically, they both seem equivalent to be, just diagrammed dif…
... some other idea
DIAGRAM 1:
1. F ... L---M--F
DIAGRAM 2:
F----M ... -
Trying out something new... thoughts?Hello All: Quick preface: 1. I am taking the Dec. 2015 LSAT. 2. I started at 132 3. average PT score is 152/154 4. Target Score: ANYTHING over…
... ) and the other 2 were diagram errors. will fix that.
Dejected StudentHey all, I'm reaching out since I have run into a few problems with the LSAT that I didn't anticipate, as I'm sure some of you have as well. I sta…
... should maybe go through 36-72 PTs again with a stricter ...June Test Takers Group BR Schedule (updated)<img src="http://anticapitalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lets-get-organized-3.jpg" > </center> My fellow June Test-takers! Please take…
... June LSAT BR Group PT 72
Tues Feb 9, 2016 ... m June LSAT BR Group 72
Tues Mar 15 , 2016 ... June LSAT BR Group PT 72
Sat May 14, 2016 ...Gone from averaging 168 to about 163 on the PTs in the 70sHey all, I was doing fairly well on my LSAT prep, scoring upwards towards the 170s. However, having taken PT 72 and 73 my score has dropped drama…
... 170s. However, having taken PT 72 and 73 my score has ...LSAT Score DropHi all, I've been studying since June, and have been scoring fairly consistently into the 170s within the last 3 months. My average is about a 173…
... weeks, I've taken LSATs 72, 73, and 74, and I ...PT 24 Sec 3 Q11Hi all, I hope someone may be able to clue me in as to what I'm doing wrong with this problem. This is a MBT. Special kinds of cotton that gro…
... /> So I understood how to diagram the stimulus. "Spun by machine ...LSAT 75 and new lsat trendsI usually score 166-168. My lowest PT has been 161. I just took the June 2015 LSAT (75) fully timed and tanked it at 156. I'm taking the LSAT this Sa…
... time consuming/tricky, and that 72 and 75 both had at ...Advanced Logic: Quiz on Mixed ConditionalsHey guys, I was going through Advanced Logic: Quiz on Mixed Conditionals and got mixed up on #20. Hopefully someone could help me out here. Exc…
... conditional), so you would instead diagram it as
(D ... />
When I translated my diagram back to English it still ...
