HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| either | 6.9K | 7.7K |
| or | 56.9K | 91.2K |
| vs | 2.4K | 2.8K |
| not | 65.1K | 113.8K |
| both | 9.5K | 11.7K |
-
Panda's guide to answer all SA, PSA, Strengthen and WeakenHi Guys, I think I have spent a lot of effort in coming this up and I want to share with you my hypothesis to see what you guys think about this …
... br /> The words may or may not be the same. If it ... that becomes either a really easy question or a really ... argument is that "mistake"-not rose and no card< ... then give roses, 2) "Not known then give a card ... br /> But since this is not MBT, so the answer choice ... -
Inferences from Bi-conditionals?Is it possible to chain up bi-conditionals, and if so, what inferences can be drawn? For instance, imagine a a grouping game with three groups and th…
... it's why we should not represent these rules using biconditionals ... nature of in/out games, not because it's correct. Instead ... should be represented with standard "not both" conditionals:
A --> ... would be:
A or C --> /B -
Why does JY write not-both rules asymmetrically?In the games videos, when JY sees the rule "if P, then not Q", he writes: P -> <del>Q</del> But when he sees "if Q, then not P" he writes: …
... acknowledges that some students use or A /B to describe this ... . I personally use the standard not both for linking up different rules ... helpful but maybe not as helpful as putting both items in a ... -
Embedded Conditionals IssueThis is a two part question in reference to the embedded conditionals video. https://7sage.com/lesson/mastery-embedded-conditional/ **Part 1:**…
... be stated as an "or statement" by negating the ... the arrow into an "or", **/A or B**. Hopefully, you can ... in mind from the "or statements" in the in/ ... this is an "inclusive or", that we could have ... https://7sage.com/lesson/not-both-v-or-truth-tables/ if what ... -
PT20.S4.Q25 - marianne is a professional chess playerDespite reviewing JY's explanation (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-25/), I don't understand why answer choice (C) is …
... the "some" may or may not address the case addressed ... C is that both stimulus have different forms or argument. So ... Involuntary
Conclusion: Therefore not responsible for it in future ...
*Answer choice "C" is not going after that time inconsistency ... -
PTB.S2.G2 - an apartment building has five floorsIn the third rule, it says that if y is not in the park if either L or O is in the park, but then on the explanation, the sub game boards, he says th…
... or O but not both. In other words:
Y----> L or O both ...
Y is in so both L and O are in ...
Y is in so both L and O
both L and O are allowed ... -
when was the last time you closed your eyes and didn't start visualizing solving made up LGs?i can't be the only one who can't remember.
... in your head as well or do you answer questions based ... complete an average game blindfolded vs. not? -
PT3.S2.Q04 - a work of architectureHello guys, Can someone please map out the logic of this argument and show how we can properly infer answer choice B? I am utterly confused :( …
In order to be both inviting and functional a work ... ; unobtrusive
or
obtrusive -> not inviting or not functional or not both
having knowledge ... of this if-then relationship is not ... -
In pilot program, Harvard Law will accept GRE for admissionhttps://today.law.harvard.edu/gre/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=hls-twitter-general I wonder how many other schools will ma…
@"Dillon A. Wright"
Can we get a Q&A/Webinar with a couple Harvard Law admissions officers to clear this up?
If not, I'm sure 7Sagers would settle for Harvard Law Dean Martha Minow. Either or
;) -
In pilot program, Harvard Law will accept GRE for admissionhttps://today.law.harvard.edu/gre/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=hls-twitter-general I wonder how many other schools will ma…
... ?
>
> If not, I'm sure 7Sagers would ... Harvard Law Dean Martha Minow. Either or
>
> ;)
Logic Games : [Never Together/Always Together] v. [Not Both] Rule ConfusionHello, During In-Out Games, I am consistently getting confused between the Not Both Rule and the Biconditional (Always Together/Never Together) R…
... a Never Together from a Not Both Rule is to quickly understand ... a "true" In-Out game or not, etc.)? I would love to ...I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
Thank you both. I've been studying logic ... to look for all the not both relationships X -> ~Y. I ... can't reverse and say not y gives x. I'm ... float in the in group OR it can be out as ... this applies to just one or both rules?The key difference btw recent lsats and the older onesMy PT scores took a hit when I initially moved onto recent PTs (60s and up) from the older PTs. I wondered why. Below is my theory and I was wonderi…
... ways. I decided to not do examples for every case ... focus on elements or intersections that are not central to the ... notion of causes being "indirect" vs "direct"
i. You ... belief and synonyms (that may or may not be synonymous) on the ...June or September? Is one month ever sufficient close in on BR? + RC tips?Hello! I wonder whether anyone here has been able to "close the gap" between their timed practice tests and their blind reviews in a short-ish per…
... this works! Good luck with either or both of the June/Sept examis that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... .wu82" ! Those two statements are not the same thing. If A ... , then not B is represented as A ... ----->/A) and A or B, but not both is /A----->B ...BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
A -->/B means "not both" so A and B could both be out. If A is OUT, sufficient condition fails and B could be OUT or IN.
A/B means "always apart, never together" so they cannot be out together. If A is OUT, B has to be IN.is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
Edit: Just saw the but not both. They are not the same thing.
not B (A->/B CP ... be
If A is not chosen (/A), now what? Nothing ... is free to be chosen or not chosen
If B is ... is free to be chosen or not to be Chosen.is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... Just saw the but not both. They are not the same thing. < ... /> > If A is not chosen (/A), now what? Nothing ... is free to be chosen or not chosen
> ... If B is not chosen (/B), now what? Again ... is free to be chosen or not to be Chosen.
...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... the elements in the "not both" MUST be selected. The ... It said "A or B, but not both." Your biconditional would ... One of A or B is selected, but not both." The way ... it being an exclusive or, which is the same ... of A or B is selected, but not both," which renders ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
...
Regarding the "A or B, but not both" statement,
I ... to get the "A or B, but not both" statement. You'll ...
A or B but not both https://www.wolframalpha.com ... /input/?i=A+or+B+but+not+bothis that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... "one of A or B is selected, but not both" in this manner ... to eliminate the confusion of the exclusive or ... . And at times, they might not write it that way, which ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... definition of "or" in the exclusive arena does not mean at ... one. In the exclusive or arena, the definition of ... saying is LSAC does not tend to use the ... One of A or B is selected, but not both." This is ... in nature than "A or B, but not both." Anyways, I don' ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... language of LSAC), "exclusive or" will always lead to one ... of the LSAT), it may not.
Even if ... this is true, it's not mentioned in the curriculum, ... you simply state, "A or B, but not both" (The LSAT does ... LSAT. Now, I'm not a logician, so I don ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... for "A or B" and for "A or B, but not both" the possibility ... of having NONE of A or ... B is not ... one" is consistent with both exclusive and inclusive or. By your statements ...Strategies for Parallel Reasoning QuestionsDoes anyone have any strategies for answering parallel reasoning/flaw questions more quickly? These questions consistently take, in my opinion, far m…
... the conclusion and work backwards, not only to identify conclusion that ... quantifiers, prescriptive vs. not, relative vs. absolute, probabilistic or absolute, et cetera). Not only this ...Law school...or nah?Hey guys! I was hoping to get some opinions on this..... I put up a post a while back about HOW I should undertake studying for the LSAT. I purc…
... . The hindrance of wondering whether or not law school and a legal ... noted that not all lawyers have the same experiences, either.
not for you. Or, you could go, and ... for wanting to go? Or do you not know enough about the ..."or" in Sequencing Logic GamesDoing a quick review of concepts that I struggled with early on. I remember the following rule being simple to diagram: L is before M but after…
... ; K is before M or after L, but not both.
> ...
> M-K-L, or L- ... link to the lesson or a game that highlights ... K is before M or after L, but not both". I think you ... after M. So
MLK or LMK
contrapositive of A or B but not both... Clarification plzI understood "A or B but not both" as one of the followings: 1. A(O) B(X) 2. A(X) B(O) 3. A(X) B(X) Then what is the contrapositive of it? …
A or B translates to /A -----> B, or is negate sufficient. The not both just makes it a biconditional /A B. So that would just be two worlds, A in, B out and B in, A out.is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... am wrong.
A or B is /A-->B ... , the A or B, but not both,
A/B or B/A
both there
and /A,/B, A and B are both not ...
