... />
Not E->M ? (So implies either M or E, you can get both ... -> not E ? (So implies either E or M , or NEITHER?...you do not even ... need to buy both?)
... ----> /N, which is a "notboth" rule. However, when given a ... and when to use a notboth rule? What triggers the use ... ? The rule "F is not included in the same group ... "notboth" rule, but could also speak as a bi-conditional [(either) or but notboth].
In regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> A or B. My question is, can both A and B be in (I.e. at least one is in) or is it just either A or B, notboth. Thank you!
...
IF (not flawed) --> (discusses function and aesthetics) OR (intended for ... 'either A or B'/notboth whereas the book is either intended ... for a general audience or ... fails: the book is not flawed (the book ...
... selected, B is selected orboth A and B are selected ... />
Notboth – negate the Necessary, then contropose. In short, 1, A or B ... is selected orboth A and B are selected.
Notboth is ... different because 1, A or B can be ...
... I'm having issues with "notboth" "or" and biconditionals, particularly in the ... common game rules that imply "notboth"? A list of common game ...
... to the same class as Y" is a biconditional for S ... -Y and S-W instead of ... single conditional. Biconditionals are either/or/but notboth and I cannot for the ... can work out S-->/Y based on group 4 negate ...
... and G (since they are both finance); the rule ended up ... 1 that is NOT finance. This means either S orY, but notY because of ... the S-Y rule. If ... _ _ S-Y H R and S are both nutrition therefore ...
... consistently getting confused between the NotBoth Rule and the Biconditional ( ... the first statement as a NotBoth, and the second statement ... the second one is a NotBoth?
2) I ... determine a rule as a [NotBoth Rule] or a [Never together/always ...
... to clarify when to use notboth (F---->/C) vs a ... be in or out together. Whereas I should use the notboth representation ... because while the variables do not have to be together, there ...
... "_not A or B_", the sentence sometimes mean not A **and** not B ... a sentence uses "_not A ornot B_", then it means literally ... "_not A **or** not B_".
However, when ... if neither P nor Q
(ii) not A if notPornot Q_
... "eitherPor L orboth are selected" and the explanation for it is if notP ... then L ( shown in photo) so what does including "both ... also mean it can be bothP AND L as well?
... it will appear as "either x ory, but notboth" which gets you a ... logical conversion of x /y. ... The contrapositive of course is y /x. These ... know either x ory must be in, without the possibility of both In ...