Agree with above posters. 1-35 is to develop the fundamentals. Once you do a timed PT, you can always foolproof thereafter. Don't burn the material though.
... />
> > I understand that fool proofing requires -0 on the ... didn't modify the FoolProof strategy and after fool proofing 40+ games ... getting at. Since you've fool proofed around the same amount ... doesn't necessarily need to foolproof all games 1-35 as ...
... the logic games using the foolproof method? I would like ... be best served to foolproof the entire 1-35 ... 7Sage. Print out and foolproof all of the problem sets ... just want to try to foolproof part of the bundle. ... Perhaps begin by fool proofing PTs 1-15 ...
... the logic games using the foolproof method? I would like ... be best served to foolproof the entire 1-35 ... 7Sage. Print out and foolproof all of the problem sets ... just want to try to foolproof part of the bundle. ... Perhaps begin by fool proofing PTs 1-15 ...
... the logic games using the foolproof method? I would like ... be best served to foolproof the entire 1-35 ... 7Sage. Print out and foolproof all of the problem sets ... just want to try to foolproof part of the bundle. ... Perhaps begin by fool proofing PTs 1-15 ...
... the logic games using the foolproof method? I would like ... be best served to foolproof the entire 1-35 ... 7Sage. Print out and foolproof all of the problem ... want to try to foolproof part of the bundle. ... That makes sense. After fool-proofing the lesson games, ...
... the logic games using the foolproof method? I would like ... be best served to foolproof the entire 1-35 ... 7Sage. Print out and foolproof all of the problem sets ... just want to try to foolproof part of the bundle. ... 16-35 set aside to foolproof as needed. I would ...
Could you maybe tell us what question you are having difficulty making inferences? Have you fool-proofed all the games in PT1-35? As @tanes256 says, J.Y.'s explanation videos are great, so if you haven't seen them, you definitely should :)