... seems like you applied the group4 rule to the stimulus, as ... up with. "Unless" falls under group 3 so you are correct ... the other part of the group 3 rule is that the ...
In the Lawgic curriculum, JY has basically set out certain formulaic methods for the different groups... so the part that follows the group 2 indicator becomes the necessary condition.
... either use that as a group four negate necessary and use ... , or use without as a group three negate sufficient and use ... up the without as a group three indicator. A word cannot serve ... as both an indicator and as a negation.
How are you going to figure out when to use this trick if you don't know the group 3 and group4 words by heart already? And if you do know them, why aren't you just doing it properly?
I've been playing around with this some more this morning and agree that now memorizing "converting" Group 3 and Group4 indicators to another type is one more thing to remember, and one too many. That slowed me down.
... be chosen for the in group. So in a grouping game ... version by specifying a specific group to which the rule applies ... always interpret this as a group4 translation, and anything beyond that ...
@"Spencer D" said:
I decided to take the first idea (not guilty), negate it, and make it my sufficient condition. So I have G---->UD/. This translates to english as "a person is guilty of a crime if they were not under duress". The ...
Thanks @jkatz1488 and @Sami ! I guess this leads me to another question, is "not" a part of group4? I put that down in my notes early on but now I'm second guessing that.