The example given on the cheat sheet states, No candy is bitter.
pick either idea and negate it right?
what about No candy? doesn't that mean candy is negated?
so instead of C arrow /B shouldn't it be /C arrow /B?
... . You have to know your 4group translations in your sleep. If ... the lessons on sufficient and necessary condition translations. You want to ... " you know it is a group4negatenecessary.
... s system are classified as "group4negatenecessary." I should add that ... be a negation of the necessary condition. That there better ... be a negated necessary condition in that relationship.< ... seem me rooting, the necessary condition has to be that ...
... sure if "not" is a group 3 indicator tho. The most ... ones we see/use within group 3 is unless, until, without ... "none" then it should be group4negatenecessary. But I think you current ...
... is great practice but not necessary to reach the correct answer ... are not Montagues" (Not is group4, negatenecessary).
**M -> intemperate** "Anyone ... Montague is intemperate" (Anyone is group 1, sufficient)
... indicators group 1sufficient, group 2 necessary, group 3 negate sufficient, group4negatenecessary and ... start learning the 4 groups of conditionals ... necessary rule falls away. Negate sufficient rule falls away Negate the necessary ...
... 4 groups of conditionals and what they do. group ... 1 sufficient: all, any ect, group 2 necessary: ... if only, only ect, group 3 negate sufficient: without, unless ect, group4negatenecessary ... into the other group. But inferences like ...
The group4 ... as the rule to apply (negatenecessary) and then treat "unless" ... to apply the group 3 indicator rule (negate sufficient) and ... instinctively would apply the negate sufficient condition to the ...
... a player via the group4 "not" or "cannot" group in the conditional ... also selected" . Question: Do I negate J to /J via cannot ... , then negate my negation of /J again ...
So Ive noticed that after taking practiced LR sections, that 4 star necessary assumptions are one of my weaknesses. I was wondering if someone else had encountered this issue and how or what solution they took to correct it?
... either use that as a group four negatenecessary and use the without ... use without as a group three negate sufficient and use unable as ... example you would not negate M in the necessary because you're ...
... with statements with both Group 3 and Group4 indicators. I realize that ...
However with the Group4 rule:
not a good ...
because one is negating the necessary (/SL) and making the other ... cases where using the Group4 rule would be better?