Currently I'm struggling with the LR section mainly because I can't consistently get the weakening questions correct. I do 90-100% on Main Point and Strengthen. Weakening questions on the other hand are a 50-50 accuracy. Anyone know how to improve?
I was wondering what's the purpose in memorizing all 9 valid argument form and all 7 invalid argument forms? Is it mainly for Parallel and Parallel Flaw question types?
... not a valid argument form (Invalid Argument Form 7): because we cannot ... confused on 7sage's Invalid Argument Form 6 which is: Invalid Argument Form 6 that I referenced ... it does not match the Invalid Argument Form 6 lawgic.
...
Do you feel that it can be helpful to sometimes view strengthen questions as weakening the opposite of the conclusion, and vice-versa? And when I say opposite, I mean the logical opposite.
... of invalid vs. valid argument forms, I stumbled across a form that ... I noticed hadn't been identified as valid or invalid ... it would be considered invalid (this is invalid argument form 4). I tried ... the curriculum is valid argument form #5: A--m--> ...
... . This was especially troublesome on Strengthen and Weaken questions. Only by getting ... the types of valid and invalid arguments for memory
- Know ...
... Weaken, and the difference with how to tell MSS and Strengthen ... apart especially when C/C Strengthen is in ... presented as a C/C Strengthen question. The stem says ... answer that actually doesn't strengthen the entomologists conclusion at ...
For strengthening questions, how much does it need to strengthen the stimulus for it to be correct. For example, weakening questions, as long as it casts doubt on the support, I can weaken the argument. Does this also apply for strengthening questions?
I know that for weaken questions we're supposed to ... question stem is cast in weakenform but refers only to the ... , if I'm asked to weaken exclusively the conclusion, should I ... answer choice that would simply weaken the conclusion, or do I ...
... identify a valid versus a invalid forum. When I physically write ... ) if it is valid of invalid. For example:
Most runners ... />
https://7sage.com/lesson/invalid-argument-form-6-of-7/?ss_completed_lesson=1151
... . There's also Strengthen and Weaken, usually in the form of "Which of ... specific piece. In LR, you strengthen the argument. In RC, you ... strengthen the *author's* argument, or ...
... . There are a ton of weaken questions that are like resolve ... where the argument makes an invalid assumption using two groups as ...
2) will strengthen the argument rather than weaken
3) will ...
... in weaken questions or a stronger link between the two in strengthen ... strengthen section where we had to try and form an assumption. Weaken ... was a lot easier for me than strengthen ...
... , it could still potentially weaken the argument. So then ... 25 has a different argument form:
Premise: Unaware falls ... after that time inconsistency argument form. Moreover take a look ... an inference. That would be invalid logically.
Strengthen, Weakening, Assumption, Flaw, Parallel question ... , one of the most prevalent form of argument on LSAT is ... on the question you can weaken it, strengthen it, find the necessary ...
... in D that makes it weaken. "Variety of soil conditions [similar ... qualification actually made it weaken instead of strengthen. D probably sounded like ... read fully and carefully to form those good habits. You got ...
... example of a cookie cutter form would be: a claim that ... fingertips the ability to weaken that structure, strengthen that structure, parallel that ... that are given in a form we are all familiar with ...
... be formulating ways that will strengthen that correlation. But if I ... why you can tweak a "weaken" question into a stregthening question ... ? Is it with the valid/invalid argument forms, group indicators, something ...