(E) There are ways slanted interpretations of data can be removed other than just through careful review by scientists who share the biases of the author or authors of the papers.
The stimulus states: "the resulting *lack of substance* leads to books
that are *short-lived items*" - This directly supports (B)s notion that: "The substance of a children's book is important to its longevity."
Yeah, that makes sense, but we've all seen PT's were a question has been "removed from scoring". Is this not an indication that the question was indeed flawed?