... like this are we strengthening Kim's argument or weakening Lee ... thought was that it strengthens Kim's, but as it directly ... , provides the strongest defense of Kim's explanation against Lee's ...
During eighteenth century ... A:* Yes, this strengthens Kim’s arguments because it directly ... nothing to do with Kim’s argument. Philosophers ... argument, but does not strengthen Kim’s.
I took my first LSAT in June 2014. And with just the help of 7Sage I got to 152 from 138. But my score is still way far from my goal. I will be taking the September test. I extended my account with 7sage but I feel I may need more .I have a very tight ...
Anyone in the Vancouver, BC area want to meet up a few times before the December LSAT? Perhaps write a few practice exams and then go over them with each other?
Is the LSAT trainer written by Mike Kim? I saw this on Amazon, just wanted to make sure it is the same book that everyone is talking about. Also, there are two versions, 2013 and 2015. Which are you guys using? Thanks.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/
It seems as answer A is actually agreeing with Lee's argument. Am I incorrect by thinking that the question stem is asking for us to refute Lee's argument?
Does anyone know if Mike Kim included anything substantially new and useful in the 2015 version of the LSAT Trainer? I have the older version (Black and teal cover with the orange fishy) and am currently giving it a 2nd read-through.
For the newbies: Add me on Skype, using handle dmlevine76.
For the regulars: If for some reason you're not in the group conversation[s] already, just message me on Skype.< ...