Thanks @jknauf, @nessa.k13.0 and @"Alex Divine"! Out of curiosity @jknauf, do you, by any chance, regret not taking the diagnostic? I mean, since you didn't have an initial score to help gauge your progress?
This is an interesting question and something that the LSAT does quite often on contemporary tests. It requires a close reading and understanding of the stimulus and really nothing more in my estimation. No fancy conditional chains or negation tests here ...
@nessa.k13.0 Awesome! I would love to have joined today, but I have yet to touch PT 65. I will do my best to join each section starting next Wednesday. :)
@DEC_LSAT Located in California - the Turlock/Modesto area.
Look, you can get in somewhere with a 3.0 and 155. If you are active in networking and meet as many alumni as you can, there's no doubt in my mind that you can be a successful lawyer
@nessa.k13.0 and @"Alex Divine" thank you both for that context! With December around the corner, I'm trying to weigh my options :) Now off to drill more logic games...