Just go in order and you'll be fine. You need to learn to delay gratification a bit so don't start blowing through all the fun LG stuff, you'll need it later to break up the LR/RC monotony.
... you're naturally good at LR or RC and games are bad ... major short-term improvement. If LR/RC really lag, that's where ... harder to learn/master than LG.
... LG I had!! Was your experimental LR? My format was LRRCLR / LRLG. I thought LG ... ok. First LR was alright, I suck at RC anyway so found ... that a little difficult, 2nd LR was ... kinda hard and 3rd LR was ok-ish ...
@Pacifico would u suggest buying section packs (LG, LR, RC) for tests 1-35 for purposes of drilling & BR and then buy newer full PrepTests fur purposes of just taking entire exams timed (and then BR after of course)
I feel like I'm not being clear. I always BR all of LG because LG is a real problem for me. Outside of that, most of my mistakes are careless confidence errors. I'm not doing that much changing of my answers or learning during LR/RC BR.
... PTs, and the Powerscore LG and LR. Probably run you about ... cold diagnostic of the June 2007 test and scored ... can improve on is LG. I was pretty much ... the LG bible and worked diligently and on the June 2014 ... just click, especially in LR and LG. Make sure you ...
Im in the same boat. LR and LG have clicked but RC is beast. I feel like it cannot be done. Im undecided on whether i should do kind of okay on 4 passages (skipping lots of questions) or slamdunking 3 (but probably still getting 1 or 2 wrong).
I am curious as to what you guys feel was the relative difficulty of each section as compared to recent prep-tests? Like, do you think the LR was "easy"? The RC? LG? Or do you all think it was pretty standard?