I'm confused to when to diagram. some inference Q are obvious with logical indicators. Some are hidden or have causation in the argument and qualifiers (maybe, could etc). When do you diagram? what's the general rule?
... "A OR B OR BOTH" rule that pertains in DEC 2000 ... 2000 Q.6-12 game, rule #2 says: If Jays, Martin ... .1-6 game, for the rule # 4 (If the stand carries ... the proper diagramming for that rule is W ----> F or ...
... condoning the continuation of authoritarian rule so my anticipation would be ... condoning the continuation of authoritarian rule
• Economic interests in a ... 5:
... specific example to a general rule) and so it isn't ... to say that "this general rule is the case" therefore "this ... argument is not applying a rule, but rather trying to support ...
... ) you explain how the first rule is basically saying that you ... seem to find a similar rule… I understand intuitively that you ... only 1 variable PER CELL rule) the reason WHY we did ...
... a result, the suggested translation rule in lawgic that we pick ... would choose "No" as the rule to apply (negate necessary) and ... instinctively apply the group 4 rule to the already negated element ... apply the group 3 indicator rule (negate sufficient) and treat ...
I am currently going through the LG bundle and I have a difficult time solving In/Out games with subcategory under time pressure. During BR I noticed in several of these games when one of the subcategories (let's call it category X ) get fulled only by ...