... . For example, see PT 127, Section2, Question 24. Just like before, pure ... , see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section4Question 18 involves the ... PT 19 Section2Question 18.
... caused by (1) volcanos or (2) meteorites or (3) a ... volcano. But, why? Why not (2) meteorites? What does the craters ... responsible for (1) meteorite craters (2) of different ages (3) ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-23/
In this ...
I think you may be talking about Section four and not section two. S4 has the psychic power question:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-4-question-20
2.Look out for ... this: check out PT 27 section4Question 20. Here we have a ... cross-section of several lesson in the ... lesson. A necessary assumption question that has an assumption that ...
... level of difficulty for each question. Is this completely objective? No ... . An extreme example would be preptest 62 section4question 18. This is an ... objectively hard question that a majority of ...
... /lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-16/
> Strengthen Question
> question regarding the answer choice (C ... questions the truth of. 2) The word "knowledge" implies that ...
... Whenever I do a Flaw question, I try to label ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-25/#comment-61737 ... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-3-question-18/#comment-62030< ... /lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-09/#comment-61721
... particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section4Question 14. What I recommend bringing ... into this question is this basic framework:< ... 50 books is for worker 2. It must be, like ... and worker 2 is me.
... miss on average 4 on LR (each section), 4 on RC (from 2 to 5 ... on each section; but I ... drill level 4 from Cambridge LR packet, doing six games (not section!) per ...
Hey! ... wrong when you attempted this question: 1) you may ... completely understand certain nuance, 2) you didn't understand ... the assumption. Doing a question this way increases your ...
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...