HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| preptest | 1.9K | 2.8K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 23 | 1.2K | 1.4K |
-
Help with Identifying Assumptions and Prephrasing in generalSo, as a person that does not make assumptions in the real world (aka: I ask and double check EVERYTHING) WEAKENING & STRENGTHENING Qs are killing …
... really bad approach to these question types. We're being asked ... for example, PT 15 Section 3 Number 23. There is absolutely no ... prephrase would correctly answer the question or not, we're ... seconds already sunk on the question.
Not having ... -
Weakness on NA/SA/weakening/flaw sectionsThese are all my incorrect questions that pop up the most as wrong answers. What can I do to fix weaknesses on these types of questions?
... the answer to that question is broadly speaking: ... is different across the question types you mentioned above ... look at PT 40-Section 3 Question 5. Here are a ... conclusion:
3.Does this question contain some type ... please see: PT 62-4-23.
Questions about Logical Opposites, i.e negationIf I negate "all", it becomes "not all." But doesn't "not all" imply two distinct possibilities, namely, "some" and "none"? If I negate the statement…
... ask this question was LSAT 46 - Section 3 - Question 15 (Necessary Assumption Question). The correct ... answer for this question was ... skipped this answer choice b/c when I negated the ...Reasoning behind LR QuestionsHello JY I had a q regarding LR. What if we have a different reasoning to why an answer is correct than the one you mention in your video but sti…
... it's
"PrepTest June 2007 - Section 3 - Question 21"
I ... the question
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-3-question ...⚖ Official August 2020 LSAT-Flex Discussion Thread ⚖Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official August 2020 LSAT-Flex Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the August…
... ’t bad.
**LG (23 questions):**
Car game
question 11 when my proctor interrupted ... next section.
During LR when I was on question 11 ... to bring it up during section 3, question 11.
If the ...What's the better strategy for SA/PSA?_Generally_, (1) If a Q opens itself up to being diagrammed (the indicators are all there, conclusion has them too), diagram it immediately, or …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-3-question-26/
>
> ... ignore this information, thus choosing C instead of E. Therefore, I ...PT58.S4.Q23 - craters high pressure shocks characteristicOk..I feel there is just no way I could have got this question. It is a most strengthen question and I feel the answer choice weakens the argument.…
... I could have got this question. It is a most strengthen ... question and I feel the answer ... about this question?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-23/PT64.S3.Q26 - pros and cons of a productI tried to diagram the premise in this question and I get R-->BOC. I picked an Idea "not rational" and negated it and made it the sufficient. But t…
... diagram the premise in this question and I get R--> ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-3-question-26/PT40.S3.Q26 - north american ph.d. programsWould it be possible to get some advice on this question? I'm lacking a way to do this problem methodically and quickly. http://7sage.com/lsat_expla…
Would it be possible to get some advice on this question? I'm lacking a way to do this problem methodically and quickly.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-26/PT60.S3.Q24 - underground rock group's recordingsHelp! I can't wrap my head around this one AT ALL. I'm not even sure what the conclusion is. http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-…
Help! I can't wrap my head around this one AT ALL. I'm not even sure what the conclusion is.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-24/PT35.S1.Q23 - rejecting a belief evidenceHi all, this question comes from PT35, section 1, question 23, i chose E on this one. Can anyone share your thoughts on why E is incorrect? I tho…
Hi all, this question comes from PT35, section 1, question 23, i chose E on ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-1-question-23/PT47.S3.Q20 - absurd to argue that people are morally obligatedPhilosopher: It is absurd to argue that people are morally obligated to act... I am totally lost in the last sentence of this stimulus. Can anyone…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-20/PT51.S3.Q19 - archaic spellings and styles of punctuationhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-3-question-19/ You can look at the stimulus in this link. I believe Jon's explanation for B…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-3-question-19/
You can ...PT39.S4.Q23 - law of supply and demand My problem on this Q is that I can exclude the other four wrong answer choices, but I can't find the right answer choice right either. Here is m…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-4-question-23/PT34 S3 Q25 - implement ecologically sound practiceshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-25/ This question asks us to parallel argument. J presents a either or situation i…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-25/
This question asks us to ...PT46.S2.Q23 - whoever is kind is loved by somebodyI diagrammed it and got K-->LS,O----> H Then for conclusion K--->H when doing all this how do I get to D? I ended up picking E because I knew it co…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-2-question-23/PT59.S3.Q13 - study of automobile accidentsHey guys, first of all here is the link to this question. http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-3-question-13/ I seem to be having a…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-3-question-13/
I seem ... understanding.
I got this question right through POE, but having ...PT57.S3.Q22 - democratic elections not fully subsidizedHey guys, I revisited one of my old PTs and got stuck at this question because I am not really understanding what the stimulus is saying. It's abo…
... and got stuck at this question because I am not really ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-22/
Ok, so ...PT60.S3.Q24 - underground rock group's successhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-24/ Really unclear as to why (B) is the correct answer. The conclusion of the stimu…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-24/
Really unclear as ...PT 57.S3.Q12 - law backed up by effective enforcementhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-12/ So, what's the deal w/ effective laws? How would you approach this one, in terms…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-12/
So, what ...PT 36.S3.Q26 - four universal forceshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-3-question-26/ Could anyone be kind enough to explain why is the correct answer choice "B". I fai…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-3-question-26/
Could anyone be ... ". I fail to grasp this question! Here's is how I ...PT26.S3.Q24 - over the last 25 years, the average price paidhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-3-question-24/ This question is beyond sucky. Did anyone else have any problems with determining …
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-3-question-24/
This question is beyond sucky. Did anyone else have any problems with determining the right answer for this question? Thanks.PT71.S3.Q18 - videoconferencing equipmenthttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-3-question-18/ I thought the answer might be D for a very different reason.... the circumstance…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-3-question-18/
I thought ... candidate X.... In an LSAT question we normally wouldn't dismiss ... give us a differently worded question or maybe we'd have ...PT33.S3.Q19 - raphaela: forcing people to help others is morally wronghttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-3-question-19/ I see why B is the best answer, but not 100 pct why it's right. Raphaela doesn't …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-3-question-19/
I see why ...PT33.S3.Q21 - some government economistshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-3-question-21/ I dismissed A right off of the bat because I've grown skeptical of the word ever…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-3-question-21/
I dismissed ...PT57.S3.Q11 - many vaccines create immunityhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-11/ This is a challenging question - largely because it hinges on 1 word - permanent. …
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-11/
This is ... a challenging question - largely because it hinges ...
It's a weaken question, but the word permanent is ... re having trouble with a question, double check for hinge ...PT57.S3.Q14 - food labelling regulationWhy does this question trip me up? http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-14/ I go so caught up in the relatively or seemi…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-14/
... that I overlooked the question stem I read initially ... lose sight of the the Question Stem....
... what's the question type for this Question "violates the rule ...Confusing necessary and sufficient conditionsHello all, I believe I understand the concept of sufficient and necessary conditions and their relationship, however, I am confused when in a flaw qu…
... confused when in a flaw question the author or speaker confuses ... . For example, in PT 64, section 3, question 11 - one of the answer ... haven't come across a question where this has been a ...LR ExplanationsI was studying with a fellow 7Sager and he sent me links of the LR questions that we would BR. I can click on the links and it'll show me the explan…
... explanations for each question. No problem there. My question is, how can ... a link for a certain question I can then hit ... the previous or next LR question. Does that make sense? ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-08/
I wasn' ...
