HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
-
PT 50 Section 4 Q22Help [Mod edit] For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/
Help
[Mod edit]
For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/ -
"A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ... -
PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, ... New York)
> +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington ... DC)
> +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago ... )
> +1 669 900 6833 US (San ... (Tacoma)
> +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston ... -
PT 1-35 as Drills or PTI'm familiar with question types and general approaches to different questions from previous study. I wonder if it makes more sense to do PT 1-35 as …
... more sense to do PT 1-35 as timed 4-section tests, instead of ... wasted the full length tests 1-35. Please let me know ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What ... to prepare:
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark it ... -
PT 1.S1.Q26 (P4) - outside the medical professionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/ I'm reviewing RC heavy, and I got stuck on this question, specifically an…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/
I'm ... -
How useful is the LR from PT 1-16?Hey everyone, So I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found it …
... I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple ... months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found ... wasting my time focusing on 1-16?
Sorry if ... -
[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... be published this year -
1. important;
2. well written ... -
Are LR sections in PT 1-16 easier?I have been drilling LR sections for a while, and I used to have a -4/-6 for LR sections in PT 18-35. However, I began doing PT 1-16 four days ago, …
... have a -4/-6 for LR sections in PT 18-35.
However, I began doing PT 1-16 four days ago, and ... that I now have a -1/-3 for these older PTs ... /> I haven't got to PT 36-83 yet. Could anyone ... those PTs (as compared to PT 1-35)?
Thanks! -
In case anyone wanted to know which LG from PT 1-35 are taught in CC...PT 1: Game 3 PT 2: Game 4 PT 3: Game 2 PT 4: Game 2 PT 5: PT 6: PT 7: PT 8: PT 9: Game 2 PT 10: PT 11: PT 12: Game 3 PT 13: PT 14: PT …
PT 1: Game 3
PT 2: Game 4
PT 3: Game 2
PT 4: Game ... /> PT 18: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT 19: Game 1 ... , Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT 20: Game 1 ... -
LG PT 1-35 StrategyHi! I know everyone has different strategies for what works well for them for FP LG PT 1-35. I would love to hear others experiences in how they sa…
... for them for FP LG PT 1-35.
I would ... the game sections.
1) How many games were you ... to get through each LG PT 1-35?
2) Did you ... you needed more prep after 1-35?
3) What ... all over again haha)?
4) How did you fit in ... -
pt 16 game 4 .. I tried over and over still can't attempt the questions any help?Hey I'm trying to foolproof games 1-35 pacifico style. I stumbled upon pt. 16 game 4. This is the hardest game I've ever seen. I thought PT.12 (game …
... games 1-35 pacifico style. I stumbled upon pt. 16 game 4. This ... ever seen. I thought PT.12 (game 4?) the flask game was ... me ur reactions to pt 16 game 4, whatever they may be ... -
RC PT 1-38I thought I would get lucky and find most of the RC sections from PT 1-38 on 7Sage since I've been drilling from the Cambridge packets. Unfortunatel…
I thought I would get lucky and find most of the RC sections from PT 1-38 on 7Sage since I've been drilling from the Cambridge packets. Unfortunately they're not all in the ultimate course :( -
How to find explanations of the LSAT PT 1~35Where can I find the explanations to the LSAT PT 1~35 questions? I signed up for the "Ultimate" package. Is it included in that package?
Where can I find the explanations to the LSAT PT 1~35 questions? I signed up for the "Ultimate" package. Is it included in that package? -
7Sage Analytics ability to only score 1 section has Disappeared?After intensive LG drilling of PT1-35, I was hoping to enter my answers to provide insight on my strengths/weaknesses in Game types. The option for…
... for clicking to only score 1 section is no longer available but ... -
PT 1-35 gone?PT 1-35 for drilling material is no longer on my course/syllabus and I can't find them anywhere on 7Sage anymore...Is this gone for other people too?…
PT 1-35 for drilling material is no longer on my course/syllabus and I can't find them anywhere on 7Sage anymore...Is this gone for other people too?
Thanks all!! -
About what percentage of LG from PT 1-35 are taught in the CC?I'm trying to figure out about how many logic games in PT 1-35 will be new to me once I finish up the CC.
I'm trying to figure out about how many logic games in PT 1-35 will be new to me once I finish up the CC. -
Won't have time to finish PT 1-35; which ones should I do before moving on to the more recent tests?Finished CC. Just did PT 1 today. I'm hoping to write the Sept test and thus will not have enough time to practice all PT 1-35 AND the more recent te…
Finished CC. Just did PT 1 today. I'm hoping to ... enough time to practice all PT 1-35 AND the more recent ... I at least do from 1-35 before moving onto the ... -
[Resolved] Acquiring LG from PT 1-35 Without Buying Ultimate+[Resolved] I just finished the CC and am beginning to foolproof games as they are by far my weakest subject (-9 to -13 on a mid-160 test). Unfortu…
... like to save as many PT's as possible as I ... for getting the games from PT 1-35 that doesn't include ... -
June 2007 LSAT Section 4 Question 13Hi there, I am going through my BR of the June 2007 LSAT. I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am trying to understand why B is wrong but E …
... . I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am trying ... -
Logic Games from PT 1-35Hi 7Sage! After doing my 5th Practice Test (PT 38) and doing horribly on Logic Games, I was wondering if doing and foolproofing logic games from P…
... doing my 5th Practice Test (PT 38) and doing horribly on ... and foolproofing logic games from PT 1-35 is the right course ... -
Scores in PT 1-20 compare to 50+ and 80+ and the real test.Hello! I been studying for LSAT for a month and a half and I have just finished PT 1-20. My scores are about 170. I’ve heard that PT 50 + are consid…
... and I have just finished PT 1-20. My scores are about ... 170. I’ve heard that PT 50 + are considerably harder, and ... PT 80+ are even more challenging. ... ask how your scores in PT 1-20 compare to those in ... -
Incorrect Answer- PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program.
The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program. -
Is it worth studying LR questions from PT 1-35?I found many Level 5 questions from PT 1-35 not only difficult but annoyingly silly. Also, looks like many do not even have an explanation video on …
I found many Level 5 questions from PT 1-35 not only difficult but annoyingly silly. Also, looks like many do not even have an explanation video on this forum? -
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... the answer. Additionally, see PT 127 Section 1 Question 25. Again, ... argue that in PT 120 Section 1 Question 24 trying ... indicate 'the #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 also involves this ... , see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 Question 18 ... -
Blind ReviewHello ladies and gentlemen, What is the correct training process for utilizing a BR? After, I have completed all 4 sections of my PT or after I ha…
... simulated PT (5 sections = 4 from a recent PT + 1 section from an old PT). I ... usually limit myself to 3 - 4 hours of continuous studying. This ... -
Cambridge bites the dustJust went over to Cambridge LSAT to check on the exact composition of their bundles and looks like all the official LSAT pdf's, including the bundles…
@allison.gill.sanford
PT 41. Section 4. Passage 1. I think the LSAC was just trolling us all. -
Does anyone have any NA advice to make it clickI am scoring somewhere between -4 to -6 on LR now (yesterday I had a -11 but I was frenzied and used the "5" setting on the 7sage proctor when I alre…
... helped me with NAs:
1.Remember what an NA is ... day parlance: check out PT 39-4-19 for an example of ... example of this: check out PT 27 section 4 Question 20. Here we ... have a cross-section of several lesson ... -
Math/Algebra ProblemsMath and I have never been close. Now with Lsat, I often come across questions that J.Y. marks as "high-school algebra" or "mathematical question in …
... a particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section 4 Question 14. What ... please now try 27-4-14, with the above ... a percentage for worker 1 than 50 books is ... the above example, worker 1 is my brother and worker ... that 50 books approved constituted 1% of their work? ...
