We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...
... very first LSAT game on PT 1 being a circle game ... , the Radar detection game from PT 15 and although it appears ... of the question you asked: PT 18 Game 3 about connecting ... fairly confident that something like PT10 Game 3 isn't something ...
... is not that different from PT 69 or the 60 series ... there are definitely differences between PT10 and PT 70 the change has ... identified a weakness during a PT. It's normal for new ...
... mistake and hesitation on one PT before you move on to ... get more from rewriting a PT in the 70s that you ... few months ago then writing PT10 (for example) fresh, as there ...
... of text (e.g. PT 16 S1 Game 1, and line diagrams ... (e.g. PT 9 S3 ... are part way through a PT, the annotations that were ... saved with that PT may not show up ... look strange. Sorry! If the PT is already completed, this shouldn ...
... -proofing the early games from PT 1-30 is the best ... through the LG sections from PT10-20 challenges a whole different ... of skills than working through PT 40-50. Due to that ...