Can somebody please explain the correct answer choice? I thought all of these answer choice were terrible/unsupported.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-4-passage-4-passage/
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section ...
... that we are going through PT 17-35 to extract the ... loose selection of questions from PT10-35 making up the problem ... pretty much every question from PT 17-35 (way more questions ...
... time. So, I take a PT everyday usually in the morning ... PTs from earlier periods like PT10 - 28 when I first ... were so hard for the PT 57 especially!
I ... got 160 on PT 57 and 168 on PT 58. This ... as I do with dropping PT scores.... could you please share ...
This question went completely over my head and I still don't understand why the correct answer is (C) for all the tea in China. If someone could please explain this question it would be greatly appreciated!
For the June 2007 Prep Test, for Section 4 (RC) and question #13 ("Which of the following principles underlies the arguments in both passages?") I see why E is correct, but why is D incorrect ("The discovery of the neutrological ...
Hey, guys! I'm having trouble understanding why B is incorrect. My reasoning for selecting B was that if the diseased male grouse were treated with antibiotics their sacs would show that they were infected and this strengthened the hypothesis because the ...
I want to know why answer E is wrong. In Manhattan Prep. It says "everyday food" is irrelevent to the question. However, couldnt water be part of everyday food? Is this also making assumptions?
I eliminated all of the answer choices. I'm not sure how the author does not question the ethical basis of an economic situation. The moral that the author suggests in the stimulus is that a country cannot live for long without foreign trade. However, ...
Hey everyone, I got this question incorrect during a timed run yesterday because I was trying to find a sufficient assumption when for a strengthen question lol.
Oh well, I'm curious as to whether you all think that this question can be ...
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
I'm confused as to how this method can be used to compare chess-playing programs - to get the question right it seemed like you needed to know that you are only comparing one chess playing program to ...
Did anyone else get rid of A and C and choose B because it seemed as though A and C were essentially the same answer and therefore neither one of them could have been correct?