HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 16 | 1.3K | 1.6K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 20 | 4.5K | 5.4K |
-
[Study Guide]: Principle Question SubtypesFor those of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry it took me so long to get this up, but below are my notes on Principle questions and subtypes. Please …
... of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry ... with caution.
-PT52, Section 3, Question 11 provides an apt example ... choice.
Question stem: “The reasoning above most ... —-> Specific
Question stem: “Of the following, which ... -
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... you choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's) or ... (e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental section)?
PT into experimental sections would be ... loss of a full recent PT.
What do you ... -
Curvebreaker PSA Question ExplanationHello fellow December test-takers! I'm brushing up on PSA questions for this Saturday, and I came across a question that I think is an excellent lear…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-3-question-12/) and a link ... second. An analogous PSA question is PT 67 S4Q08, regarding ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-4-question-08/
question comes in: PRECISION. Especially ... -
Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... but now i'm drinking 20 more cokes a day than ... of water. That is only 20 percent. Now I only drink ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-3-question-22/
Our ... /lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-03/
PT 34 #13: ... -
PT56.S3.Q16 - Therapist: The ability to trust other peopleErased because of forum rule of not posting info direct from PT's. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-3-question-16/ **Admin n…
Erased because of forum rule of not posting info direct from PT's.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-3-question-16/
**Admin note: edited title and added link** -
Confusion about : "The {person}'s argument proceeds by...."I am a little confused about questions in which a scientist/critic/psychologist/whatever will state their opinion on something, often giving context …
... their own argument. Then the question stem will ask "The scientist ... of this is Question 20 from PT 68 section 3. I missed this question in timed ... tricked me into thinking the question was actually "precedes by" rather ... -
Quick question on whether or not this assumption is ok for the LSATIf cars drive faster, there will typically be a higher accident/fatality rate. **PT 57 Spoiler below** I'm writing out an explanation for https:/…
... accident/fatality rate.
**PT 57 Spoiler below**
I ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-2-question-20/ and I got to ... -
PT 21.S3.Q16Can anybody help me with this question, because it is driving me crazy. Why is B wrong? The stimulus clearly states "**any**given individual molecu…
... anybody help me with this question, because it is driving me ... a whole molecule?
This question is truly infuriating, any help ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-16/ -
PT.60.S3.Q3 - building permit cannot be obtained by Feb 1I'm literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to diagram this? From my understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to…
... literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to ... the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"**
https ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-03/ -
What makes a hard logical reasoning question hard? Hey, guys! So, I'm working through finishing the 7sage course to prepare for the September LSAT. One thing I've found myself wondering in preparin…
... influence how hard a LR question is to reason through:< ... thinking here of PT53-Section1-Question 16)
2.A "non- ... thinking here of PT77-Section 4-Question 20)
3. Very tricky or subtly ... /> 4. For me, any "except" question is a nightmare. hahaha!
Still having timing issuesHi all, I am many months into studying for the LSAT and still struggling with timing. A bit about my particular situation: I have gone through…
... not adequately answer this question, I should first test ... , please see: PT 20-Game 2. Question 12 can be ... we try first. PT 11 game 3 question 19 for example. ... have missed 21 or 20 on LG if I ... your personal growth on the section. Any further questions, ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
...
6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ...
16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
18) Red herring (PT 18, S4, Q11; PT18, S2 ... />
20) Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... > 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... >
> 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
> 18) Red herring (PT 18, S4, Q11; PT18, S2 ...
> 20) Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also ...PT53.S1.Q20 - lions and tigers are similar (diagraming question)How do I diagram this? http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-1-question-20/
How do I diagram this?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-1-question-20/PT 57.S3.Q12 - law backed up by effective enforcementhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-12/ So, what's the deal w/ effective laws? How would you approach this one, in terms…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-12/
So, what ...A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... + A -most->B"
3. "A-->C + A some ... .
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
3. Do not go home for ... we take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No part-time ...A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... + A -most->B"
3. "A-->C + A some ... .
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
3. Do not go home for ... we take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No part-time ...PT 36.S3.Q26 - four universal forceshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-3-question-26/ Could anyone be kind enough to explain why is the correct answer choice "B". I fai…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-3-question-26/
Could anyone be ... ". I fail to grasp this question! Here's is how I ...Weaken question - trap answer choice or no?Hi fellow 7sagers, As a review tonight I decided to write down steps I take for weakening questions. I’d appreciate any response to this question I…
... appreciate any response to this question I have... PLEASE! It ... video explanation I watched, PT 60 Section 1 Question 13 (in short – ... “Serious Medical Condition – Weaken Question” video lesson and in that ... question, Answer Choice (A) serves ...Can you diagram "is" and "because"?I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16. Any tips highly appreciated.
I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16.
Any tips highly appreciated.Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 "In Europe ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ... diagram above is wrong. My question is why is it wrong ...Pt 54 section 4 question 24"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago". By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why th…
... healthy economy?
This question is the only one I ...Science Experiments in LR QuestionsPowerscore claims that recently PTs have had a lot more science experiment questions in LR. I've obviously taken a bunch of science classes and know …
... />
For example, on PT 71 Section 3 #4, E is the right ... don't know if my question makes sense haha but I ...PrepTest 16 - Section 2 - Question 16 (Most Difficult)E is the answer. This conclusion is: CPUE number same -> shark numbers are same To weakedn the conclusion, we need to establish that the way to r…
... changed since 1973.
This question defines the CPUE carefully.
PT 50 Section 4 Q22Help [Mod edit] For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/
Help
[Mod edit]
For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/PT. 51 S3 Q12Can someone please explain this question... I'm not really sure what's even going on in the stimulus. <font color=red>Admin edit: Here's the passa…
Can someone please explain this question... I'm not really sure what's even going on in the stimulus.
Admin edit: Here's the passage for reference
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-3-question-12/PT 73 Section 3 Game 2Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X c…
... Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for ...Preptest 69 - Section 1 - Question 14 ("forest fires")I had a hard time distinguishing the actual flawed reasoning here. I initially chose A because the logic matched perfectly, but changed my answer to …
... was more obviously flawed. My question is: when in doubt like ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/
