HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 19 | 1.2K | 1.4K |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q11 | 168 | 180 |
| five | 1.3K | 1.5K |
| thousand | 104 | 107 |
| books | 2.4K | 3K |
-
When to implement Sufficient/Necessary conditions into logic game rules.Hello everyone, I've been tackling LG for some time now, and it seems that practice is paying off. However, in/out LG games still seem to tank my …
... -93-section-4-game-3/ (PT 93 S4 G3)
https ... )
For example, in PT 93, JY explains that the ... other in/out games. In PT 61, I tried applying the ... a conditional relationship similar to PT 93 is only when there ... -
PT 93 S4 GamesCould any 7sage administrator or someone tell e where the difficulty would be onthese four games? Especially games 3 and 4 please?
Could any 7sage administrator or someone tell e where the difficulty would be onthese four games? Especially games 3 and 4 please? -
Identifying flawsI'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw? Is PT 52 S3 Q4 …
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks -
or and both Conditional Chain rulesConfused as to why we did not chain the second rule, O---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there was a similar condition and we did pu…
... ---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there ... " conditional statements. Additionally we had PT 23 S1 G2 where we ... -
RC, LG,RC, LRJust took the june exam-6th. LR was so weird but not hard-if you memorize a bunch of ways on how to do it you fail very abstract. LG - they kind of g…
... one was a cake walk-pt 19 vibes. what happened to good ... -
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
...
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 ... problem across several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section 2 ... evaluating answer choice D in PT 19 Section 2 Question 18. < ... br />
PT 151 Section 2 Question 12 ... -
PT78.S4.Q11 - Could someone help me out here?Could someone help me out here? The stem reads "The passage suggests that Taruskin's position commits him to which one of the following views?" I'…
Could someone help me out here?
The stem reads "The passage suggests that Taruskin's position commits him to which one of the following views?" I'm having trouble understanding why AC D is wrong here. I selected AC D because in lines 6-7 ... -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Pt 15 - S4 - Game 2 (Country of ... lawgic
Pt 6 - S4 - Game 4 (Network of Bridges ... lines
Pt 6- S4- Game 3 (eight benches)
Pt 4 - S3 - Game 4 (Ski ... brute force.
Pt 16- S1- Game 4 (Tennis ... -
in out gameshey can i get a quick list of some in/out games. having issues need some practice thanks. :)
... for all the games from pt 19-38. You can find the ... -
PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
@"Dillon A. Wright" said:
Hey 7Sagers
I thought for a second Dillon had finally started studying for the LSAT for real!
I believe you still owe us some real-time logic games ... ;) -
NA Questions on the Recent Exams.Anyone feel like some of the correct answers to NA questions on the recent exams aren't really necessary? On PT 71,S1, Q22 I see how this would be …
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right? -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... some in the LSAT context. PT 62 S4 (towards the end, the ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... case of the question mentioned (PT 62, S4, Q23), the incorrect answer ... -
How to break through a plateau?Hi friends, I appear to be in a bit of a dilemma. I'm registered to write the Sept. LSAT and have been practicing steadily for about two weeks. I'm…
... be) at most 4-5 PT's, so you're still ... you just taking PT's, are you reading some books, are these ... -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... old as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for ... -
Official September LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official September LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the September 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground ru…
@remooooved said:
Virus Game = 5 or 6 questions? I thought it was only 19-23.
Five. Man that question sucks the bag. (the virus question, not yours!) -
Chart skeptic's challenge: show me a game for which a chart definitely saves timeI've just gone through the "Grouping Games with a Chart" lessons, and for each of the four games -- two in the lessons and two in the problem set -- …
Just ran into another example: PT 47 S4 G3 -- record stores and music ... -
PT72.S4.G1 - a radio station airs hourly news updatesA condition stated is "Within each segment, reports are ordered by length, from longest to shortest." For purposes of my question I'd like to emphasi…
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ... -
Contrapositive of embedded conditionals?The user and all related content has been deleted.
Example statement from PT 62.S4.Q18: "If there are sentient ... -
Intermediate conclusionsI'm having trouble differentiating the IC from the premises and I don't like IC questions in general...if something leads to a conclusion then it mak…
... intermediate conclusion. An example is PT 30 S4 Q13. The subsidiary(intermediate ... -
Better to spend more time on later tests?Hey all, So I'm starting to feel convinced that at a certain point in prep, it's better to focus on later tests. That is, if you aren't going to pre…
... on them. I started with PT 19 doing 1RC 1LR and redoing ... -
Better to spend more time on later tests?Hey all, So I'm starting to feel convinced that at a certain point in prep, it's better to focus on later tests. That is, if you aren't going to pre…
... on them. I started with PT 19 doing 1RC 1LR and redoing ... -
Okay - I admit it, you guys were right. Breaks help....For the past week I have been far too busy at work to do any LSAT. This weekend I freaked out when I tried to do an LSAT and could not for the life o…
... timed test - an earlier one (PT 19) - and scored my highest score ... . I also understand that this PT score of 175 is not ... -
"if all and only those" -- biconditional?Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
Example of this flawCould somebody explain and provide me with an example of the flaw described below? " Something that is merely a matter of opinion is treated as if…
I guess the "as if it were subject to verification" is what was tripping me up. But I think I got it now. Thanks.
@LG_Candide : it was a flaw descriptive question. PT 20 S4 Q18
