... place. The next Proctored PT will take place on ** ... week-rc-blind-review-pt70-s2/)) were fun! We had ... https://7sage.com/event/proctored-pt-5/).
Once you ... **This week's recommended PT is test 73**; you' ... review/)). You can take the PT through 7Sage, or- if ...
... right place. The next Proctored PT will take place on **Saturday ... January 23rd classes Blind Reviewing PT 73 here: [LR](https:// ... ](https://7sage.com/event/proctored-pt-free-4/).
... right place. The next Proctored PT will take place on **Saturday ... -review-pt72-s2/)) and ([RC](https://7sage.com/event/pt-of-the ... ](https://7sage.com/event/proctored-pt-free-5/).
... right place. The next Proctored PT will take place on ** ... sessions](https://7sage.com/series/pt-blind-review/). On Monday we ... flagged LR questions from PT76 S2, focusing on the most difficult ... Series](https://7sage.com/series/pt-blind-review/)). You can take ...
... noted the most difficult individual PT sections in all three pre ... , 7-S4,17-S2, 17-S3, F97-S1, 23-S3, 28-S1 ... , F97-S3, 22-S4, 24-S2, 26-S2, 27-S1, 28-S3 ... , 71-S3, 72-S2, 76-S2, 78-S1, 81-S2, 84-S3 PT A, B, and C LG ...
... example, it's an old PT, but I think **PT6.S3 ... question on circular reasoning (**PT49.S2.Q23**):
https://7sage.com ... /lsat-49-section-2-question-23/
... ; @Nathaniel said:
> S2 LR 17/25
> ... S3 LG 18/23
> S4 RC ... the section where blind reviewing PT's helped most clearly. ... clip them out of your PT's too.
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT :joy:
Here ... confusion errors:
PT17.S2.Q11(★); PT22.S4.Q21(★★★); ... Q25 (★★★★★); PT64.S1.Q24 (★★★★); PT67.S2.Q09 (★★); PT68.S3.Q21 (★★★★★); ... now but something like PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★) may be a ...
Not quite sure if this is the appropriate category to ask this question, but here goes...
I just finished the "Intro to Arguments" lesson and wanted more practice, so I returned to the June 2007 Practice Test. As I went through Section 2, I ...
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.
* Premise:
- TV news watchers have NO expectations of careful discussion of public issues.
- newspaper readers have the expectation of careful discussion of public issues.
* Conclusion: In contrast to regular newspaper ...
I took PT 46 yesterday after upgrading my ... LG, and -1 RC. On PT 50 I got annihilated on ... , -1 RC from -14 LR..). PT 51 was "in between" 50 ... LR than I did on PT 50 but not as well ... as I did on PT 46 (-6 LR).