HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| sec | 187 | 247 |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 24 | 1.1K | 1.3K |
-
Hard LR questions with conditional logicAnyone have any tricky LR problems involving conditional logic that they've encountered and could share? Either individual problems or a list, if you…
PT 61, Sec. 2, Q. 24. Ran into this problem yesterday and made a note to go back to it and try to find questions like it because the conditional logic is unconventional, at least to me. -
Chunky Question StemIn hindsight I understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated it because in the STIMULUS the comparison was to the **same amount…
... understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated ... -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21 -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
To add to this list - #20 part to whole flaw: PT 62, Sec 2, Q 7. -
Delete.Delete.
... give you more context, pt. 68 s.2 q.24's stimulus claims:
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ...New Video for PT 32 Game 2Hey guys, I just posted a [new video for PT 32, Game 2.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK7e4OebIug) It's a difficult in/out game that can be mad…
... a [new video for PT 32, Game 2.](https://www.youtube.com ... a [new lesson for PT 2, Game 3.](https://www.youtube.com/watch ...In case anyone wanted to know which LG from PT 1-35 are taught in CC...PT 1: Game 3 PT 2: Game 4 PT 3: Game 2 PT 4: Game 2 PT 5: PT 6: PT 7: PT 8: PT 9: Game 2 PT 10: PT 11: PT 12: Game 3 PT 13: PT 14: PT …
... /> PT 2: Game 4
PT 3: Game 2
PT 4: Game 2
PT 5:
PT ... , Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT 24: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game ... 4
PT ...Conditional RuleHey guys so I have a question regarding logic games and conditional rules. Specifically it is from PT #27, Sec 2, Game #4. For question #22 in the ga…
... rules. Specifically it is from PT #27, Sec 2, Game #4. For question ... next to it in line. 2. Car 1 cannot be orange ... . and 3. Car 4 cannot be green ...How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
...
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 uses 'most ... several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section 2, Question 24. Just ... 'the #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 also involves ... For example, see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 ...PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... . Its saying "Many", so maybe 2 species don't have that ... the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus ...Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
The question ... point of the argument? (PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS ...Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... 2 problems from practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 ... Section 2 #3 "In ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ...A confusion between conditional logic and causationHi 7sagers, I just had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation is if Hormone causes Stress, then reducing Hormone can redu…
... a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation ...PT77.S2.Q16 - Some people see no harmHi, everyone! I need some help going through questions 16 and 18 of PT 77, Sec 2. <font color=red>Admin edit: Please review the <a href="htt…
... questions 16 and 18 of PT 77, Sec 2.
Admin ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-16/
PT 3 SECTION 2 QUESTION 5I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it …
I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it doesn't show that megatelescope research is worhty for comparison.... matter? I feel like this is one of ...How to approach "most logically completes" LR questionsDoes anyone have a specific strategy for these? They seem to be cropping up more often, and I usually do it by gut instinct, which is fine with easy …
... having issue with is PT 74, sec 4, Q 7. I didn't ...Panda's guide to answer all SA, PSA, Strengthen and WeakenHi Guys, I think I have spent a lot of effort in coming this up and I want to share with you my hypothesis to see what you guys think about this …
... SA questions. For example: PT 68, Sec 2 Question 23 was, at the ...PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ...June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 68 | Tuesday, April 10th | 7:30 pm ESTJune'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 68 | Tuesday, April 10th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/xox9kxPMcM81y/giphy.gif **Thank You …
... was still struggling on S 2 Q 24 so I broke it down ... I actually thinks it makes 2 causal jumps (remove and reduce ...New Study GroupHello everyone! I recently just restarted studying for the LSAT and I am looking to form a study group that meets a few times a week, Monday-Thurs…
Hey guys, I had asked yall a question regarding pt 68 LR 2 question 24. I figured out my mistake but if yall wanted to go over it I can discuss it, its actually really simple now that I've figured it out.PT54.S2.Q24 - 1.3 billion cows worldwidehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-2-question-24/ i'm having a hard time understanding the answer for PT 54.2.24 ("there are 1.3 b…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-2-question-24/
i'm ... the answer for PT 54.2.24 ("there are 1.3 billion cows worldwide ...PT 59 - wtf happened to my score???I recently took PT 59. I've been scoring in the low to mid-160s, but this time it dropped to 156. I suppose a 4ish point drop isn't that big of a de…
I recently took PT 59.
I've ... away)
On Sec 2 (LR), I got 6 answers ... either.
However, on Sec 3 (LR), I got 10 answers ... perform like this on Section 2. Maybe I was tired ... especially hitting Section 3 (but usually this doesn' ...PT88 BR with J.Y. on Nov. 1 - 16, 2 - 5pm ETHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). There will be 16 sessions total. All sessions will be from **2 - 5pm ET**.…
... 'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). < ... /> [none]
Obtaining PT 88
If you have ... able to view and print [PT 88 under the Syllabus](https ... , 21, 22, 24
Sunday, November 3
Section 2 - LR, Questions ...PT 89.S2.Q24 - The increase in minimum wage in Country XHey y'all-- I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the discussion forum here seems to get more attention sometimes, so double-posting. P…
... /> I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the ... for our future LSAT progeny :3
Reference: https://7sage ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-89-section-2-question-24/
[P1] If ...Feb 24th FREE Proctored PT & Live Class Blind ReviewIf you're ready to get more practice taking a full LSAT Prep Test under simulated online proctor conditions, you're in the right place. The next Proc…
... Proctored PT will take place on **Saturday February 24 at ... https://7sage.com/series/pt-blind-review/). On Monday ... ://7sage.com/event/proctored-pt-free-8-2/).
2) Select a PT that you want to ... there.
3) Show up to the Zoom ...7Sage Changes and UpdatesA fellow 7Sager had a great idea of making a discussion thread to let you all know about site changes and updates, so here we go! JY and I will do o…
... />
Jan. 24
* Personal Statement 2 all drafts and commentary ... Feb. 10
* Personal Statement 3 all drafts and commentary now ... version of lesson for PT 67 Passage 2 (Nisa Shostak !Kung ... game-boards lesson for PT 36 Game 3 (Bus Window Aisle ...Superprep 2 PTHas anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
Has anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
