@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ...
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ...
... !
> I just finished PT38 and scored a 176, BR ... />
> P.S. Planning another PT tomorrow, so that will be ... />
If you just finished a PT, I wouldn't do another ... work on besides just another PT. Doing PTs back to back ...
... />
> > I just finished PT38 and scored a 176, BR ... ; > P.S. Planning another PT tomorrow, so that will be ... ; If you just finished a PT, I wouldn't do another ... work on besides just another PT. Doing PTs back to back ...
... > > I just finished PT38 and scored a 176, BR ... gt; P.S. Planning another PT tomorrow, so that will be ... work on besides just another PT. Doing PTs back to ... to doing a full PT while still getting in ... need work, then take another PT.
I think the conditional elements intertwined in In/Out games make it much more difficult (at least for me). Although nothing's scarier than that star game in PT38...