My initial answer choice was the correct answer (B). But I ended up going with A because the language seemed too extreme. Should we expect/allow the language to be extreme in principle questions? HELP!
But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it since I did not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have broken down the first sentence to see ...
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ...
Can some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2 Q4. Specifically, things like probability or likelihood trip me up. Any resources or explanations would be appreciated! Thanks!
... easiest ones. It was a 3.1 hr session and it took ... each were (Averaging at 1.5 min for each question ...
2: 2/5 3: 1/5
4: 2/5 ... , I reviewed the first 3 by jotting some notes down ... .
... improved from consistent -8,6 to -3,2
At this ... my score improved to -3 range I stopped seeing any ... fact that its almost always 3 questions wrong per section ... I am destined to miss 3...)
Would there be ... closing the gap from -3 to perhaps 0?
Flaw Question-- calling all folks who are a beast at LR:) HELP?
I understand that the answer is C but I want to make sure that I'm breaking down the argument correctly:
*Best way to understand --> Direct Empathy (that's what some ...
... . I will be going over PT's in 70 plus series ... to do PT schedule. Instead of a 3 month set PT schedule we ... flexible. When we review a PT, then I will assign which ... PT we will do next. I ...
Do schools take into account what school you went to for undergraduate when looking at your GPA. i.e. a 3.1 at Harvard vs a 3.8 at UGA? Is the LSAC calculator universally applicable?
I know I’m gonna feel like an idiot when this is explained, however, right now I feel like an even bigger idiot because the correct AC (B), is really confusing me. If there is much less methane in Earth’s atmosphere today than there was 3billion years ago, ...
... well due to familial circumstances (3.2). Three years later, I ... and a minor at a 3.9 GPA. If LSAC counts ... my GPA down to a 3.6 or 3.7 and I'm ...