HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 52 | 440 | 519 |
| s | 69.2K | 125.1K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
-
How much harder has RC become in the later tests?Hey all, Another RC topic here. I've only been drilling from early PT's, PT 35 being the latest. I've only taken full timed PTs from the 30s and …
... the comparative passages starting in PT 52, I actually think RC is ... are the same as from PT 1. The ACs can hinge ... I'm not sure that's a new development at all ... that jump in LR. LR's evolution has been dynamic enough ... -
Randomly bombing LG before Feb LSATSo I've been following advice to go over questions just to refresh my brain before the LSAT. LG has always been my strongest section, with usually go…
... 4 Q types in LG: (1) if's (2) CBT/CBF (3) MBT ... /MBF (4) rule sub.
23 Q's ... / section - 4 acceptability Q's ... = 19 Q's.
rule sub ... -
June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 52 | Tuesday, Feb 13th | EndedJune'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 52 | Tuesday, Feb 13th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/l0O9x3V6b4eEb9XK8/giphy.gif I hope…
> @BinghamtonDave said:
> So many good questions to review and learn from on PT 52, I look forward to the call!
I got wrecked hard on Section 3 Dave. I will need your wisdom Sensei. -
Help! Fool Proof Method Days Stacking Issue!So I've been fool proofing post CC. I started out on a schedule of 1 PT a day, drilling each game on day 1, 2, and 7. I'm figuring out that games are…
... Day 2. I took PT 1's game again on day 2 ... Game 2 Game 3 Game 3 Game 3 Game 3 Game 3 Game 4 Game ... 4
Day 2: PT ... also making some mistakes on PT 2's games.
So ... I was done with PT1's games. After that I was ... -
PTing - 5 section or 4 section testI've been PTing 5 section tests, just tossing in one extra section at random. When I grade the PT, I dont include the random extra section in my scor…
... doing 6 section PT's to great effect (full PT plus 2 from ... another random PT in a 3-break-3 format ... ve done four 6 section PT's and I find my ... needed after a 6-section PT though so it may ... points lower than my best PT, all of which were ... -
In need of help with this exampleI would say I am at the point where indicators and making diagrams has become second nature for me. But, this particular problem has my mind going in…
...
So let's break this down into two ... br /> Apply 'unless' as group 3, negate sufficient.
... />
Now...what's exactly does it mean to ... going to assume it's single layer sequencing.
PT 32, Section 3, Game 1. There's a couple ... -
70 hours of prep later - no score improvementI took PT 63 yesterday and scored on the low-end of my PT average (158). This is the same score that I got on my last 2 practice tests and I am start…
... " I do about one PT every 2-3 weeks. Sorry for putting ... a weird format lol. That's just what came to mind ... . I generally take a PT on saturday, i'll BR ... , I have only taken 4 PT's since finishing the CC and ... -all I have only 2 PT's since I started working on ... -
Advice on a study plan post curriculum?I took my first PT after the curriculum -- my score was one point less than my diagnostic score, and my BR was the same as my BR for my diagnostic. N…
... first post-cc PT was only about 3 points higher than ... I would do about 1 PT's worth of timed sections and ... and then a full PT under timed conditions on ... day.
3) Absolutely it's fine to use 50 ... every question from a PT you took 3 months earlier. Or ... -
RC Review GroupIf anyone is interested in meeting semi-regularly to review RC passages/question types they find especially difficult let me know and I can organize …
... start with PT 36 passage 3 and then move to PT's 42 and ... 45 Sections 4 and 3 ... comparative passages. Section two from PT's 54 and 55 are both ... take either of those as PT's in the near future. -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... , Q24)
3) Analogies that really aren’t ... /> 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
18) Red herring (PT 18, S4, Q11; PT18, ... part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also ... /> 22) Relies on people's opinions as fact (PT28, S1 ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... /> >
> 3) Analogies that really aren’t ... ; 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
> 18) Red herring (PT 18, S4, Q11; PT18, S2 ... part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also ... gt; 22) Relies on people's opinions as fact (PT28, S1 ... -
RC Review GroupIf anyone is interested in meeting semi-regularly to review RC passages/question types they find especially difficult let me know and I can organize …
Great to see there's even more interest! I'm moving to a new city tomorrow with a three hour time change so how would this Saturday at 11 PST work to look at PT 42 passage 4 and PT 45 passage 3? -
Help with Identifying Assumptions and Prephrasing in generalSo, as a person that does not make assumptions in the real world (aka: I ask and double check EVERYTHING) WEAKENING & STRENGTHENING Qs are killing …
... 't.
That's an abrupt answer, but it ... the argument, and there's just such a broad ...
Take, for example, PT 15 Section 3 Number 23. There is ... to be disturbed unless it's removed," or "The ... are the benefits? Let's first consider the best case ... -
In/out gamesHey guys, I’ve been practicing in/out games for a while and although I understand most of it, there are a few things that still confuse me enough …
... be in, and if it's in, C has to be ... a biconditional. I.e -pt 83 game 3
>
> ... -
Weakness on NA/SA/weakening/flaw sectionsThese are all my incorrect questions that pop up the most as wrong answers. What can I do to fix weaknesses on these types of questions?
... Take a look at PT 40-Section 3 Question 5. Here are ... What is/are the premise(S):
2.What is ... the conclusion:
3.Does this question contain some ... we have found our assumption(s): we deny or affirm ... type of assumption please see: PT 62-4-23.
... -
Stupid Mistakes in Logic GamesHey everyone! So I'm writing for the first time in 4 days and am trying to do what I can to make sure I don't bomb my logic games section. I cer…
It's not foolish to think so, ... the LSAT but on PT 57 Game 3 there is a rule ... -
Stupid Mistakes in Logic GamesHey everyone! So I'm writing for the first time in 4 days and am trying to do what I can to make sure I don't bomb my logic games section. I cer…
... ; @BinghamtonDave said:
> It's not foolish to think so ... the LSAT but on PT 57 Game 3 there is a rule ... -
Understanding FallacyWhat would this fallacy look like: Mistakenly equating what is actual for what is merely possible?
Thank you all for the help!! The question was for an old lsat 7 S.4 Q.3 -
⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November…
I need to confirm that I’m not crazy, but did anyone think one of the LR questions on passwords and security looks like a similar question from a previous PT? I had 3 LRs so I don’t know if it’s experimental or not -
⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November…
... question from a previous PT? I had 3 LRs so I don ... ’t know if it’s experimental ... -
⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November…
... question from a previous PT? I had 3 LRs so I don ... ’t know if it’s experimental ... -
⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November…
... question from a previous PT? I had 3 LRs so I don ... ’t know if it’s experimental ... the exact same thing. See PT 11. -
⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November…
... question from a previous PT? I had 3 LRs so I don ... ’t know if it’s experimental ... was on a pretty recent PT too. Basically the same content ... -
⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November…
... question from a previous PT? I had 3 LRs so I don ... ’t know if it’s experimental ... the exact same thing. See PT 11.
I DEFINITELY ... -
⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November…
... question from a previous PT? I had 3 LRs so I don ... ’t know if it’s experimental ... the exact same thing. See PT 11.
>
> ... -
7Sage App is glitchyI had the app on Android but as of today I stopped using it due to constant glitching which actually threw me off and my performance while practicing…
@"Cant Get Right" that's how I have been accessing ... discussion board too. Unfortunately there's no way to access the ... , Solide, and Truvest's names from PT 68 Game 3), which is no ... app was nice. Regardless, it's an amazing resource for 7Sagers ... -
Logic Games tune up b4 LSATHey everyone, for my last week before the LSAT I just want to tune up on games to ensure a -0. Would like 4-5 prep tests with solid and challenging g…
... s a little list:
Challenging Logic Games
PT ... br /> PT 70 game 3
PT 41 game 4
PT B ... circle game
PT 2 game 3
PT 2 game ... /> PT 40 game 3
PT 29 game 2
PT 33 game 3
PT ... -
Logic Games tune up b4 LSATHey everyone, for my last week before the LSAT I just want to tune up on games to ensure a -0. Would like 4-5 prep tests with solid and challenging g…
... Alex said:
> Here’s a little list:
> ... >
> PT 77 game 3
> PT 79 game 4 ... br /> > PT 70 game 3
> PT 41 game 4 ... br /> > PT 2 game 3
> PT 2 game 4 ... br /> > PT 40 game 3
> PT 29 game 2 ... -
Biconditionals -- Chaining vs Splitting?This has come up briefly before on the forums, but I wanted to ask more about chaining biconditionals rather than splitting. On PT 54 game 1, because…
... /lsat-49-section-1-game-3/
>
> The ... easier/more time efficient. It's turning out to be much ... included in that list is PT 57 Game 3.
