@dennisgerrard said:
I reviewed the PT76 LR section today and can't find the experimental section for LR. I had five sections on my PT76 while the 7sage only have four sections' explanation. Any idea?
@nantesorkestar said:
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
good call Alex - I'm going to take one last PT tomorrow and try the 5 hour energy during the break, and see how it goes. If I feel "off" or different, then I'll probably forego it.
... . I assume it's below 3.5 If it's not below 3 ... .5 you just need to ... you get a 168. It's really that simple. If you ... 're below 3.5, like a previous poster said ...
... , drill, whatever it is the PT suggests you need to do ... addressed every weakness from the PT, that's when you should take ... thoroughly review a test, that's okay. Quality over quantity.
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.
... situation question you eliminate 3-4 answer choices based off your ... cannot recall **ever** eliminating 3-4 answer choice on a standard ... an inference garnered upfront: PT 77 Game 4, question 18, but never ...
I recommend at least 3 days off if not 4 or 5. When I get to this point, I veg a little, and try to do some active mental rest like a quality, make you think podcast or chess.
... pretty bad time to do PT 80's BR calls. I've ... addition, I'll do this PT again in early May. I ... will align better with people's schedules who planned to take ...
... PTs. Think of each PT as a fully contained ... something like:
PT
BR
Analyze Performance ... br />
Most folks take a PT, and then if they're ... the next PT. But in that PT, there's still a ... of performance. After each PT, it is vital to ...