HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 54 | 229 | 268 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 16 | 1.3K | 1.6K |
-
PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You ... very relevant to answering the question, though not absolutely necessary.
PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"** -
PT49.S4.Q16: "difference between beauty and truth"The furthest I got to solving this question was diagramming it: mR-s-/best mR=mT Beauty=truth----> mR=best Beauty=/=truth Is there a structura…
... I got to solving this question was diagramming it:
mR ... structural way to approaching this question? Because the overlapping terms are ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/ -
PT49.S4.Q16 - Extremely confused about when a statement is a conditional statement.I am confused about the logic translations seen in the video explanation for a particular LR question: **LSAT PrepTest 49, Section 4, Question 16** …
... a particular LR question:
**LSAT PrepTest 49, Section 4, Question 16**
Link: https ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/
PTB.S4.Q25 - Some residents of Midville claim...Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently,…
... and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or ...PT9.S4.Q20 - Of every 100 burglar alarms police answer...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?Strengthening Causal ReasoningWhen it comes to strengthening causal reasoning, I understand that offering other instances where a cause leads to an effect (cause -> effect) will a…
... . One particular question that shows this logic is PT 66 Section 4 Question 12.
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... indicate 'the #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 also involves this verbiage ... ). For example, see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 Question 18 involves the ... in PT 19 Section 2 Question 18.
PT 151 Section 2 Question 12 ...Written ExplanationsI noticed, just by fluke, a written explanation detailing why answers were wrong beneath a video explainer but I can't seem to replicate it on other …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-130-section-4-question-16/Need help from a Sage? (Closed)Hi all, I got a ton of help from fellow 7Sagers when I was studying for the LSAT. Now that I'm a Sage, I'm trying to pay it forward by helping out…
Thanks!
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 16 | D
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 02 | BNeed help from a Sage? (Closed)Hi all, I got a ton of help from fellow 7Sagers when I was studying for the LSAT. Now that I'm a Sage, I'm trying to pay it forward by helping out…
... :
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 16 | D
The stimulus says ... .
LSAT PrepTest 27, Section 4, Question 02 | B
The stim ...Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
I ...58.4.16 Madden: Industrialists address problemsI don't really see how B is supported in the situation nor how D does not. Can someone evaluate my reasoning? The question stem is pretty weird.…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-16/Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
... annoyed if you ask a question that has already been asked ... before I posted!
PT 66 Section 4 Question 20.
Conditionals ...Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... : Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... (answered B, correct answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 ..."A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ...PT76.S2.Q18 - an article claims that many medical patientsCan someone please explain in a real simple way I read the explanation but I just don't get it with these types of questions Thank you in advance …
... this PT although I did unusually worse on the RC section. Might ... be nerves?
This question considers the ... actually recommend re-visiting PT 23, Section 2, Question 16. It hinges on a ...Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.Does anyone have any NA advice to make it clickI am scoring somewhere between -4 to -6 on LR now (yesterday I had a -11 but I was frenzied and used the "5" setting on the 7sage proctor when I alre…
... day parlance: check out PT 39-4-19 for an example ... of this: check out PT 27 section 4 Question 20. Here we have ... a cross-section of several lesson ... lesson. A necessary assumption question that has an assumption that ...What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I started scrambling ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... wonderful advice. I have one question: how is strengthening/ weakening the ... example take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ... a five star difficulty strengthening question. I am sure a ... of the difficulty of this question is answer choice "A" ...PT18.S4.Q16 - Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitorshttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-16/ Strengthen Question I was able to get this one correct by eliminating wrong ch…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-16/
> Strengthen Question
>
question regarding the answer choice (C ...Necessary and Sufficient Answer Choices in the Same QuestionCan someone point me to LSAT LR q's that are either necessary or sufficient questions types that list BOTH a necessary and sufficient answer choice? …
I think PT49 S4 Q16 does it...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/Math/Algebra ProblemsMath and I have never been close. Now with Lsat, I often come across questions that J.Y. marks as "high-school algebra" or "mathematical question in …
... a particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section 4 Question 14. What I recommend ... bringing into this question is ... ? The answer to that question is one of the ** ... br />
My next question would be what if there ...PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.How to do flaw q when you can't see the flaw/prephaseI know JY advises against moving onto the ACs without coming up with a prephase for flaw questions, but there are unfortunately usually 2-3 flaw ques…
... right. The older tests (PT 1-PT 20) are really good for ... the sufficient/necessary flaw on PT A section 4 question 20 mean? Suggestion #1 ... the remaining.
4.Drill that question after and eliminate that ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
I see some of these are still empty so you can add these to your list.
9) Confusing probability for certainty (PT54, Section 4, Question 16)
11) Percentages v. quantity (not a flaw question but RRE; PT39, S2, Q5)PTA.S4.Q25 - People's intentions cannot be...Can someone provide an explanation for this question? #help
Hi!
This is my first time using this service, so thank you for clarifying. It is PT A, Section 4, Question 25.September Study Group | PT 54 | Sunday, June 25 @ 7p EDT / 6p CST / 4p PST ###Test Details: **PT:** 54 **Experimental Section:** LR#1 From PT58 **Question review form :** https://zach191.typeform.com/to/dblQhM Al…
... **PT:** 54
**Experimental Section:** LR#1 From PT58
**Question ... I am including the experimental section in the poll. We ... will review the experimental section at the end of ... / 4:00pm Pacific
For our full PT schedule ...PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the ... 2nd LR section will not be ... won't be doing every question on the test, just those ... />
**UPDATE: PT69 section 4 LR (second LR section) BR call - Wednesday, March ...
