... was the case with PT26.S1.G3. However other times if ... was the case with PT19.S1.G.4. What do you ... to split them, however for PT.26.S1.G3, I had just ...
This asks to weaken the geologist's argument. I cannot wrap my head around why D is the correct answer. Someone please help!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-23/
I watched the video.Yet I'm still stuck in (B). Any ideas and insight will be appreciated.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-23/
I was thrown off by the question stem for A.1.23, in which it asks, "The Y's response would most seriously call into question which one of the following conclusions, if that conclusion were drawn on the basis of the evidence given by X?" Does this question ...
PSA are just not clicking for me and I feel very uncomfortable answering them even when I get them right. I'm drilling them this afternoon and I had some trouble with this question. Any tips on PSA in general would be great as well as input on this ...
Hey, guys. Why is there talk of three M here when the rules say exactly two M? JY mentions three M and others also mentioned in the comments section. What am I missing here? Three M was never an option for me becatse of that rule.
Having a bit of trouble getting my head around this question. Originally chose B, but correct answer is C. Had a bit of a crack at it, anyone please elaborate or correct me on my thinking!
would some one please help me understand how to properly translate answer choice E into formal logic? i have some idea from the discussion in the video explanation, but im having issues identifying the cues that led to these translations.
Why is "only very careful drivers use headlights when their use is not legally required" the answer here? I literally can't bend my mind to figure out why that changes anything after the headlight law went into effect and the resulting lack of collision ...