Hi all, could someone help me see why B is not supported? The way I see it, the scientist shouldn't be allowed to profit from his technology... But if he isn't ALLOWED to do something, isn't that a restriction? And doesn't that go against the statement " ...
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
... br />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... LSAT BR Group PT 37
Thurs Jan 14, 2016 5pm ... PT63
Thurs Apr 14, 2016 5pm June LSAT BR ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT69
Thurs May 5, ... LSAT BR Group PT 72
Sat May 14, 2016 5 ...
... />
The past few PT's I've written have ... on PT 78, 165 on PT69, 164 on PT 71, 164 on PT ... scored a 160 on PT 72 and today I ... scored a 162 on PT 79. I'm hoping ... And as for today's PT, I'm concerned that ... too hard about my PT scores anyway because I ...
... March 17, 7-9pm EST, PT69
Sunday, March 24, ... 7-9pm EST, PT 71
Sunday, March ... 31, 7-9pm EST, PT 73
Sunday, April ... -9pm EST, PT 75
Sunday, April 14, 7-9pm ... EST, PT 77
Sunday ...