HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 7 | 6K | 7.4K |
| sec | 187 | 247 |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 16 | 1.3K | 1.6K |
-
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
Hi ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-21/
this ... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ... -
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... to the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus ... -
Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... I am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS's ... -
[Free LR Tutoring] - PT86.1.Q-Evens Tuesday 9pm CST.What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M**an-of-**P**assion, i-think-the-lsat-is-a-cunt, _lsat_sus._ Do you ever…
... LR tutoring session on PT 86 Section 1 EVENS. **Try to have ... our sessions (imo).
1. Goals - prove to you why ... .** note whether or not the Q yielded a predictable pre-phrase ... -
PT7.S1.Q16 - Comets do not give off their own light...PrepTest 7 - Section 1 - Question 16 Can someone explain? **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of qu…
PrepTest 7 - Section 1 - Question 16
Can someone explain?
**Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question”** -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/ -
PT 79 section 1I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried. -
Examples of SA Questions w/ a Bi-Conditional?Hello 7Sagers, I’m going over my last PT— 65– and in section 1 Q 16, there’s a sufficient assumption question with a bi-conditional premise. I und…
... over my last PT— 65– and in section 1 Q 16, there’s a ... major time sink on the PT because I froze up. Can ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What to do to prepare:
Complete PT ... 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
Tonight RC review pt 63 passages 1/2Hey guys, If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews da…
Hey guys,
If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews daily. Please message if you'd like the link.
Madison -
How to approach "most logically completes" LR questionsDoes anyone have a specific strategy for these? They seem to be cropping up more often, and I usually do it by gut instinct, which is fine with easy …
... having issue with is PT 74, sec 4, Q 7. I didn't want ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
To add to this list - #20 part to whole flaw: PT 62, Sec 2, Q 7. -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading ... -
When do we know "in other cases" can be helpful or not?Hi, I thought "other cases" are alwas irrelevant to the case discussed in the stimulus... I thought "yes, maybe that happens in this case, but ma…
... /> But for example in PT 71 Sec 1 Q12...the correct answer is ... -
PT63.S1.Q10 - ms. sandstrom's newspaper columnHi all, Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questio…
... and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never ... this problem sneaky.
1) "Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-1-question-10/ -
Context Indicators?So, I thought the words: But, although, and However introduce context. But, a lot of the MP/MC that I've done use these words as premise indicators. …
... .
For Example, PT 40, Sec 1, Q9.
Do these ... -
Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8. -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21 -
Logic Games Attack StrategySo I've got three weeks left in the Army before I start terminal leave and I've finally reached the end of the learning curriculum and the only thing…
... if you're starting with PT 7 and made all four ... comment formatting:
PT 7
LG 1
Date Time Score ... -
Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question. -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ... -
PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ... -
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
... to Answer Choice E in PT 38 Sec 1 Q20. I am not ... -
How to do Evaluate QuestionsI've missed nearly every single Evaluate question I've come across. How are we supposed to approach these? Is there a list of all the evaluate questi…
... across this question type in PT 7 Sec 4 Q8. I was trying ... -
Hard LR questions with conditional logicAnyone have any tricky LR problems involving conditional logic that they've encountered and could share? Either individual problems or a list, if you…
PT 61, Sec. 2, Q. 24. Ran into this problem yesterday and made a note to go back to it and try to find questions like it because the conditional logic is unconventional, at least to me. -
In case anyone wanted to know which LG from PT 1-35 are taught in CC...PT 1: Game 3 PT 2: Game 4 PT 3: Game 2 PT 4: Game 2 PT 5: PT 6: PT 7: PT 8: PT 9: Game 2 PT 10: PT 11: PT 12: Game 3 PT 13: PT 14: PT …
...
PT 5:
PT 6:
PT 7:
PT 8:
PT 9: Game ... 2
PT 10:
PT 11 ...
PT 13:
PT 14:
PT 15:
PT 16: Game 1, Game 2 ... -
Improvement Tips from my 7 Month LSAT JourneyHi everyone! I recently got back a 174 on the October LSAT and some people reached out with questions about study tips, so I thought I would type up …
... with tests 1-35 (16-35 are CC, and 1-16 I broke ... a 174, up 5-7 points from my previous two ... but with several (like 5-7) questions flagged that I wanted ... me - we took every PT concurrently, and would review together ... , yet I scored 5-7 points lower on each test ... -
Retake disaster/need help from a mod..So I have now taken the LSAT 3 times, and I'm beyond frustrated. I took the LSAT for the first time OCT, 2013 after 6 months of study self-study and …
... . At that time I was PT scoring in the high 160 ... . [RC -8, LG -1, LR 1&2 -16 (bombed LR)]
7, LG -9, LR 1&2 -10). I ... as it always lands around -7 to -10, I get my ...
