HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 7 | 6K | 7.4K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
-
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that ... -
For those who score within -5 in RC...+RC general questionHow do you read passages? Do you just scan the structure and not remember the details? And go back to the passage for each question? (or just questi…
... games. I'm reviewing a PT LG section right now. The struggle ... -
BR Confidence QuestionLooking for some input. I have found that overwhelmingly the questions I mark for BR are questions that I am getting right while the questions I am m…
... it right. But the next PT or section practice I do, I ... -
Do they actually check how much water bottle we bring into the test center?Hello, So I have a question about this... Do they actually check this? Would appreciate insight who took LSAT... I was wondering because I have…
... piece of gum right before section 1 and right before the break ... -
Blind Review Group | PT C2 | Wednesday, November 2 | 7 pm EST<h1>Wednesday, November 2 at 7PM ET: PT C2</h1> Click here to join this conversation: <a href="https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381" target…
@tanes256 said:
Can someone give me an idea of a game or something on that test?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-c2-section-1-game-1/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-c2-section-1-game-2/ -
For those with accommodated testing for the december lsat....i was wondering if you guys know how the testing will differ from normal testing. i received an email yesterday from lsac with the following: "We …
... follows:
Section 1 53 minutes total
Section 2 53 minutes ... as follows:
After Section 1 10 minutes total
... -
Chart skeptic's challenge: show me a game for which a chart definitely saves timeI've just gone through the "Grouping Games with a Chart" lessons, and for each of the four games -- two in the lessons and two in the problem set -- …
... wanted to bring up PT 35-Game 1. This is actually an ... 've tried. For this set: PT 35, getting this game done ... know how it goes @"steve-1" -
[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
I joined late for the session, can someone that were there explain question 10 for section 1 please?
nvm, discussed with the remaining BRers after JY left :P -
[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
Can anyone explain question 19 in section 1? We ran out of time yesterday. -
PT79.S4.Q22 - after a hepadnavirus inserts itselfI'm totally lost with this question. So when the Hvirus inserts itself into a chromosome of an animal, fragments of the virus are passed onto the des…
@nantesorkestar said:
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
@bbank0218 @DByrne07
I had the same setup! I definitely had the same section 1 and section 5 LR, but I'm pretty sure I had a different section 3. I think that was the experimental one. -
Anyone else feel like they could have scored either a 140 or a 170?I am not going to lie, I could see it going either way. I went with my first choice every single time, without making sure that it wasn't a trap answ…
Absolutely! Section 1 went somewhat well (RC), I felt pretty good about section 2 ... 'm not mistaken, my third section/second RC was the experimental ... I hope it was! 4th section (LR) didn't go so ... -
September 2016 retakersIf you took the September LSAT how do you feel you did on December? Better or worse?
... me losing my shit on section 1,2,3 and 4. I ... -
How to improve LR sectionHello! I'm wondering what is the best way to improve on LR. I heard of the drilling packets and I'm debating getting them. Has anyone improved using …
Very much agree with what's above, I also think drilling and Bring some of the earliest PT LR section is useful. It kinda gives you a window into the LSAT writers first intention with LR and helped me see a bird's eye view of the section. -
About "without" It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
PT 61, Section 4, Problem 25. And yes ... -
Warming up before a PT? IF so how much?I read in the past in some 180er's blog that he used to do a LG section before each PT to warm up. So I started doing that. 1 section of LG, usually …
... do the equivalent of about 1 section. 1 RC passage, 2 games, and ... - 15 questions in an LR section. That leaves me warmed up ... -
PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ... -
PT19.S1.G3 - each of two boatsWith regards to the second rule, does anyone know why we can't simply place both F&G in out group? JY's explanation suggests placing G (Out) in one …
@ljazayeri said:
, does anyone know why we can't simply place both F&G in out group?
We can but that's only one possibility.
so our rule says when F out -->G out (in this case both F and G are out like you ... -
Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation. -
How do I access all my starred question explanation pages?As I progress through the course, I watch the video explanations for my BR and star them for review. But I'm having trouble finding them all convenie…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-1-question-24/ is to go ... -
PT12.S4.Q22 - a long-term health studyHey All, So we have this health study that found that people who gained approximately 1 pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, t…
... of this, please refer to PT C2 Section 3 Question 15 (Deer ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
I got ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 134 too for LR but section 1 seemed so much more difficult ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @xrssa89 said:
> I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
how do you know it's experimental one? -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
I also ... had LR for 1,3,4 but I remembered ... a question from 1 that someone who doesn't ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
>
> ... ; I also had LR for 1,3,4 but I remembered ... a question from 1 that someone who doesn't ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
This was ...
