HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 72 | 859 | 1K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 7 | 6K | 7.4K |
-
November'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 76 | Thursday, October 18 | 7:30 PM ESTNovember'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 76 | Thursday, October 18 | 7:30 PM EST This week's call will be led by our very own @"Kristen B" :) …
... | Blind Review PT 76 | Thursday, October 18 | 7:30 PM EST ... />
Note: Take the PT under timed conditions; BR to ... the process of taking a PT, BR-ing it thoroughly, ... that were ascertained from that PT/BR can be really ... free to take a PT or two every week ... -
was PT 72 really hard?took PT 72 this past week. Man I got pummeled. Tough LR, RC, and LG. Anyone else feel this PT was really hard? Even with the curve, I still felt it w…
took PT 72 this past week. Man I got pummeled. Tough LR, RC, and LG. Anyone else feel this PT was really hard? Even with the curve, I still felt it was really really hard. -
Possible Substitution Equivalency StrategyHi. Im studying for the June LSAT and (like most people) am having trouble with SE questions. While watching on of JY's game explanation videos for P…
... game explanation videos for PT 66 and noticing some ... to this in this case (PT 66, section 3, Q11). However, upon ... be funneled into the last Q for a final comprehensive ... rule, knowing the SE Q is coming, and having ... as you work through the Q's, might be very ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are ... titled. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"** -
Incorrect Answer- PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program.
The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program. -
Logical Reasoning February 1997 section 3 question 25For PrepTest February 1997 - Section 3 - Question 25, what is the difference between C and D and what makes D correct? Super confused
For PrepTest February 1997 - Section 3 - Question 25, what is the difference between C and D and what makes D correct? Super confused -
RC PassagesTypically, it takes me 5/6 minutes to read an entire passage without ignoring anything. How in the world can one read some of these lengthy and b…
... find the details after a 3-3:30 minute read. If you ... I read.
Passage 2, PT 14, Section 3.
Paragraph one ... them" - answer A to question 7 does just that.
Question ... from the deconstructivists POV, paragraph 3 gives one from the author ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've been ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I ... had to read this 3 times to ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... /> 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... )
7) Confusing necessary and sufficient conditions ... 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also describe ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... ; 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... br /> >
> 7) Confusing necessary and sufficient conditions ... ; 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
> ... Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also describe ... -
Possible Substitution Equivalency StrategyHi. Im studying for the June LSAT and (like most people) am having trouble with SE questions. While watching on of JY's game explanation videos for P…
... game explanation videos for PT 66 and noticing some ... to this in this case (PT 66, section 3, Q11). However, upon ... be funneled into the last Q for a final comprehensive ... rule, knowing the SE Q is coming, and having ... as you work through the Q's, might be very ... -
LR Diagramming TipsBest advice for LR diagramming? I still find it a bit difficult to do to get the right answer.
... question types. For diagramming parallel q's, making an accurate diagram ... to use question 14 from PT 6 section 3.
The stimulus ... specific questions re: diagramming parallel q's I can elaborate more. -
"In fact" = "But"?Does "In fact" function as a transitional indicator? That is, does in fact signal the switch from context to argument? eg (PT 64 section III Q 22) …
... to argument?
eg (PT 64 section III Q 22)
scientists astounding ... -
Most and without together in a sentence. Totally confused!I was working on PT33 LR Section 3 Q.8. The stimulus starts with "Most people invest in the stock market without doing any research of their own." Tu…
... was working on PT33 LR Section 3 Q.8. The stimulus starts with ... -
PT72.S3.Q11 - developing a nearby abandoned railroad grade into a hiking trailhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-3-question-11/ Hi folks, I can't for the life of me figure out why the correct answer for quest…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-3-question-11/
Hi ... for question 11 in sec. 3 of the June 2014 test ... -
Confusing necessary and sufficient conditionsHello all, I believe I understand the concept of sufficient and necessary conditions and their relationship, however, I am confused when in a flaw qu…
... looks like. For example, in PT 64, section 3, question 11 - one of ... -
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 "In Europe ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ... -
PT 41, Section 3, Question 3I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR. BUT, I watched the video and I reasone…
I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR.
BUT, I watched the video and I reasoned it differently.
We're taught that, if we're given a premise, we have to take it to be true, ... -
Science Experiments in LR QuestionsPowerscore claims that recently PTs have had a lot more science experiment questions in LR. I've obviously taken a bunch of science classes and know …
... />
For example, on PT 71 Section 3 #4, E is the right ... -
PT 23 Section 3 Question 12Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like …
Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like it's a flaw because it goes from health food enthusiasts to saying in general, those who take XYZ will ... -
PT 73 Section 3 Game 2Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X c…
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X can go before Z as long as Y goes after Z. I am having trouble with my fundamentals, please help, ... -
Mapping Logical Reasoning: Do we have a set of questions available?Hi Everyone! I've been doing a lot of work recently with memorizing valid inferences that can be made from conditional and inter-sectional statem…
... set of questions similar to PT 43, Section 3, Question 9, beginning "Most ... -
How to diagram "is"/"usually"How do you diagram "is"/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22. "The morally preferable act is usually the one that serves the lo…
... "/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22.
"The ... -
Abstract language.I have an issue with the harder flaw reasoning questions. 99 times out of 100 i can point out the flaw. Hell i can make a stand up comedy routine abo…
... abstract language down. (random example. PT 41 section 3 question 20)
PT's. sort of just wanted ... -
Conditional Reasoning; Relation to Premises and Conclusions?Hello Folks, I posted this in the powerscore forum as well, but it looks a little dead over there. I was hoping I might be able to pick someone's …
... , I believe this is from PT 31 Section 3 Number 22.
Confusion about : "The {person}'s argument proceeds by...."I am a little confused about questions in which a scientist/critic/psychologist/whatever will state their opinion on something, often giving context …
... this is Question 20 from PT 68 section 3. I missed this question ...Tip for Flaw QuesstionsVery often, you will be able to eliminate two answer choices from a Flaw Question very quickly and easily due to their obvious faults, leaving 3 poss…
... to their obvious faults, leaving 3 possible correct ACs.
... become stuck between these 3 ACs, a tip that ... have only included the remaining 3 ACs):
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-3-question-11/
...PT72.S3.Q7 - In one study hospital patients' immune systemI'm not sure if this is the correct place? Are we allowed to ask questions about individual questions? If it's not allowed (sorry!) let me know and I…
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-3-question-07/difference between Suff. Assumptions vs. Nec. Assumptions that act as a "bridge."Hi everyone, I'm confused about the difference between Sufficient Assumptions vs. Necessary Assumptions that act as a "bridge." I understand th…
... /> As an example, PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https://7sage ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section ...
