HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 77 | 465 | 540 |
| section | 23.4K | 38.4K |
| 2 | 23.8K | 33.5K |
-
PT 70, Section 2, Question 6Hi, On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wrong. I f…
Hi,
On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wrong. I feel like C isn't fair enough because it has words like "chance" and "try to identify" which means ... -
PT 66 Section 2 Question 13: Brooks: I'm unhappy in my....Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pre…
Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pretty subjective to me, "mischaracterizing what Brooks says", "unhappiness varying in intensity of ... -
PT48.S2.Q19 (G4) - three folk groupsPT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19 Questions asks: Which one of the following groups must perform earlier than 10? Does that mean it includes 10? …
PT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-48-section-2-game-4/ -
PT77.S2.Q02 - anthropologist: one of the distinctive traits the stimulus it says "getting more calories" on the other hand D says "uses more calories" I thought the two are different things...why D strengthen…
the stimulus it says "getting more calories" on the other hand D says "uses more calories" I thought the two are different things...why D strengthen the stimulus?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-02/ -
PT77.S2.Q20 - critic: it is common to argueHi All, So the stimulus in #20 reads, "If one does not criticize a form of behavior in oneself or vow to stop it, then one should not criticize…
... other's behavior or
2. ~Criticize one's own behaviour ... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-20/ -
Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... /> Looking at PT 22, Section 4, Q13 and PT 62, Section 2, Q17, I can ... -
PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claimI eliminated answer choice D because it says, "fails to exclude...." As I see it, answer choice D would perfectly address the flaw in the argument if…
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-18/ -
PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claim that shakespeareCan anybody tell me what this answer choice is exactly saying? I just want to know what it's trying to say because I don't think I'm completely under…
... reasoning question (Preptest December 2015, Section 2, LR, Question 18.)
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-18/ -
Proposition QuestionsProposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this questi…
Proposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this question type is PT 82 section 2 question 14.
Thanks in advance! -
PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-2-game-3/ -
PT 59 Section 2 (LR1)Could somebody explain to me why the correct answers are correct for questions 7, 18, and 25? Why is 7 (e) instead of (b), why is 18 (d) instead of …
Could somebody explain to me why the correct answers are correct for questions 7, 18, and 25?
Why is 7 (e) instead of (b), why is 18 (d) instead of (c), and why is 25 (b) ?
Appreciate any help, thanks -
PT 3 SECTION 2 QUESTION 5I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it …
I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it doesn't show that megatelescope research is worhty for comparison.... matter? I feel like this is one of ... -
Chunky Question StemIn hindsight I understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated it because in the STIMULUS the comparison was to the **same amount…
... understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I ... -
Weak answer choice in Necessary AssumptionI am a little confused about the weak answer and strong answer choice in necessary assumption question. So it said in the CC that we should always lo…
... the correct answer. For example, PT 24 Section 2, Q17. The AC B ... -
Advice on improving timed LR score?So I've now gotten to the point where I am able to get around 22 points correct in BR /untimed in LR. I am someone who really gets tripped up by the …
... timer (especially in this section) to the point where ... one daily timed LR section this week as I ... scores. I just took PT 62 section 2 (I believe it' ... free) tutoring in this section or knows someone who is ... have great potential in that section (usually score 21+ ... -
Consistency in LRI am having trouble with consistency in LR sections. Some days I will take a PT and go -3 to -5 on the LR sections, and other times (like today PT 84…
... days I will take a PT and go -3 to -5 ... , and other times (like today PT 84 section 2) I will get -12 ... -
Tutoring sessionsHello everyone after taking the August LSAT and a short break I want to give back. I want to offer free tutoring to everyone, one on one or groups de…
... be doing Blind review for PT 50 Section 2 (LR) on Saturday (9 ... )
Also Blind Review for PT 50 Section 1 (LG) on Sunday ... -
Where can I find LR video explanations?I'm working through some LR drills and going over my wrong answers, but can't seem to find video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, an…
... video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, and PT A Section 4. Any ... to find PT 3, but couldn't get videos for section 4 ... specifically. Same goes for the other PT videos ... -
PT56.S2.Q23 - Can anyone explain how this is an illegal reversal to me?<a href="https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q23-ecologist-without-the-intervention-of-t579.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.manhattanprep.com/…
... is described here. It is PT 56 Section 2 Question 23. I was ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-23/ -
PT9.S2.Q20 - A university should not be encouraged to patent...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20? -
PT69.S2.Q15 - How to interpret "except" as a logical indicator in this context?Hi, Could someone please help me with interpreting "except" in this sentence? In order to encourage personal responsibility in adults, societ…
... short premise is originally from PT 69 Section 2 Q15. The way JY ... questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ... -
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... />
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 uses 'most ... across several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section 2, Question ... see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 ... PT 19 Section 2 Question 18.
PT 151 Section 2 ... -
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration of ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions include:< ... -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... recently gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct answer ...
