I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
... . The Cambridge "Miscellaneous" packet from PT's 1-39 contains the ... PT 6 - Game 3 PT 6 - Game 4 PT8 - Game ... 2 PT 9 - Game 4 PT 10 - Game 3 PT 11 - Game 4 ...
I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...
... of text (e.g. PT 16 S1 Game 1, and line diagrams ... (e.g. PT 9 S3 ... are part way through a PT, the annotations that were ... saved with that PT may not show up ... look strange. Sorry! If the PT is already completed, this shouldn ...
... Example would be questions like PT J07 S2 Q9 (missed something ... answer. Or questions like PT J07 S3 Q10 (missed a key ...
Memory method passages in this PT
Memory method law and ...
Archive important LR questions in PT J07 to retake, untimed next ...