HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| a | 136.3K | 436.2K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 24 | 1.1K | 1.3K |
-
PTA.S1.Q09 - Letter to the editorPrepTest A - Section 1 - Question 09 Why is A the answer in this question? **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - bri…
PrepTest A - Section 1 - Question 09
Why is A the answer in this question?
**Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."** -
PTA.S1.Q16 - Giordano Bruno, the Renaissance philosopherPrepTest A - Section 1 - Question 16 For this one I was able to gather my information to see how I could even weaken this argument. Automatically …
PrepTest A - Section 1 - Question 16
For this ... my process of reading this question type, I was automatically thinking ... make him the spy in question. AC A gave that set up ... Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."** -
PTA.S1.Q21 - Reliable tests have shown that KoolairPrepTest A - Section 1 - Question 21 I dont understand this question. I thought the flaw was making a generalization about one characteristic and …
PrepTest A - Section 1 - Question 21
I dont understand this question. ... I thought the flaw was making a ... placing the characteristic as a whole. Why isnt ... the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."** -
PTA.S1.Q21 - Reliable tests have shown that KoolairPrep Test A Section 1 Question 21 I was stuck between answer choices C and E for this question but am having a hard time fully understanding why C…
Prep Test A Section 1 Question 21
I was ... and E for this question but am having a hard time fully ... , please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."** -
PTA.S1.Q4 - Safety Inspector and BiologistPrep Test A, Section 1, Question 4 is a flaw question with a Safety Inspector and a Biologist. Can anyone explain to me why C is wrong? Thank you :) …
Prep Test A, Section 1, Question 4 is a flaw question with a Safety Inspector and a Biologist. Can ... , please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."** -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
Preptest 10 Section 1 Question # 24
The diagram of ... contains an "if" that creates a causal relationship that they clearly ... -
PT28.S1.Q24 - we ought to pay attentionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-24/ Could anyone explain which sentence of this question's stimulus is the conclusion?…
Here's the master guru J.Y explaining this question. It's a tough one, and it seems like a lot of people thought that the first sentence was the conclusion.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-24/ -
Necessary assumption woes.I currently suck at this question type. I mean I do not have a clue on what I am doing even when applying the negation test. what is a good strategy …
Check out this specific NA question. It's a great question and a great explanation by JY.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-24/ -
PT9.S1.Q19 - editorial: it is clear that if this country's universitiesCan you guys explain PT 9 section 1 question 19? it reads Editorial: It is clear that if this country's universities were living up to ~~~ I do…
@"mc_meatt" said:
PT 9 section 1 question 19
PT9,1,19 is within ... 2 LR sections in that PT- Q#19 does not fit ... any way to verify the PT, S, Q #'s - we are ... -
Do you guys draw in the margins during LR?Recently I have been having a lot of success during exercises for LR. This, to me, is a miracle since it was my weakness and what hampered me from br…
... us to answer the question in a clear and concise manner ... I mean: Diagraming conditionals: PT 36 Section 1 question 11. Before I decided to ... jobs. If you have a dolly, a moving job is made ... my mind before I answer a necessary assumption.
... -
Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation. -
How do I access all my starred question explanation pages?As I progress through the course, I watch the video explanations for my BR and star them for review. But I'm having trouble finding them all convenie…
@"Dillon A. Wright" so for example, ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-1-question-24/ is to go through ... Hm that's kind of a bummer. I had hoped ... would be part of the question bank. But it looks ... LSAT Explanations and Question Bank are separate silos ... -
The indicator "even if"Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong t…
... "jumps", it acts as a sufficient indicator.
... it would definitely translate into a sufficient necessary relationship)
a sufficient indicator is because ... PT 46 Section 3 Question 24, are you referring to answer choice "A"? ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... .
For instance, in a problem where differentiating between key ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I had to ... read this 3 times to get a ... -
Mistaking sufficiency for necessity vs mistaking necessity for sufficiencyI'm a bit confused about the technical differences between the errors of (1) mistaking sufficiency or necessity and (2) mistaking necessity for suffi…
... us:
A---->B
a sufficient necessary conflation ... same mistake. That question is: Pt 51 Section 1 Question 20. That is ... with the appearance of a sufficient/necessary conflation on ... present. But, that is a discussion for another time : ... -
How to do flaw q when you can't see the flaw/prephaseI know JY advises against moving onto the ACs without coming up with a prephase for flaw questions, but there are unfortunately usually 2-3 flaw ques…
... right. The older tests (PT 1-PT 20) are really good for ... different ways can you spot a sufficient/necessary flaw? How ... necessary flaw on PT A section 4 question 20 mean? Suggestion #1 is to ... />
4.Drill that question after and eliminate that weakness ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question gives us:
A ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where ... answer choice (B) looks like it is describing a ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question gives us:
> A ... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
> ... comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where ... answer choice (B) looks like it is describing a ... -
PT8.S01.Q10 - If the public library shared by adjacent towns..Could you please explain why E is wrong? **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"**
I think you mean PT 8, Section 1, Question 10. If not, please let ... this case, the conclusion is: "A library in central Glenwood would ... for more people than would a library in central Redville."
(B) is a better answer because it addresses ... -
The phrase "even if" on LRWhen sentences start with "Even if" or "Even when" or "Even though", I've had a bit of trouble parsing out why LSAT writers put the word "even" there…
... does play a role in the argument? PT 46 section 3 question 24 has even ... if in an answer choice A, but ... -
PT60.S1.Q24 - mammals cannot digest cellulosehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-1-question-24/ Okay, so perhaps I'm overthinking this, but here goes: I put down (B) rather…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-1-question-24/
Okay, so perhaps I ... -
PT28.S1.Q24 - we ought to pay attentionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-24/ Could anyone explain which sentence of this question's stimulus is the conclusion?…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-24/
Could anyone explain which ... sentence of this question's stimulus is the conclusion ... -
PT47.S1.Q24 - consumer advocate: the manufacturer'sWtf, back to back LR questions I just can't figure out during BR. Can someone breakdown the answer choices? I eliminated all of them during the tim…
... during BR, so I completely 1/5 guessed B. I am ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-24/ -
PT 29/ Section 1/ Question 8Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written?
Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written? -
PT74.S1.Q24 - any driver involved in an accidentSomeone please help... https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-24/
Someone please help...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-24/ -
PT74.S1.Q24 - any driver involved in an accidentFor this question (it's helpful to watch the video), JY does the logic and it comes out to this: Capable and (PI or 500) --> Report ~Report _…
For this question (it's helpful to watch ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-24/ -
PT74.S1.Q24 - Accident leading to personal injury or property damagePersonal Injury (PI) or personal damage exceeding 500 (PD>500)------> LR (legally required to report accident) "Unless the driver is incapable"- Cap…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-24/ -
Superprep A: Section 1, Question 11 (Astronauts)I understand why the correct answer choice is correct because if robots were the only things going out to space, then why do we need to know anything…
I understand why the correct answer choice is correct because if robots were the only things going out to space, then why do we need to know anything about human limits but I don't understand why B is incorrect. Isn't the stimulus making the assumption ... -
How would you lawgic this phrase?From PT B - Section 1 - Question 06. **None except the most virtuous deserve praise** I know it's part of the 4th group, where you negate the n…
From PT B - Section 1 - Question 06.
**None except ... -
Explanation?Hi JY! I don't quite understand this answer choice as I eliminated option A and B as they mention water levels - which aren't specifically addressed …
I believe the OP is referring to PT 20 Section #1 Question 1
