Can anyone explain why S3 Q24 on PT 93 is B and not C? I know C has the conclusion less clearly delineated but other than that it seems to match up slightly better.
... start a new thread for PT June 2007, but related threads ... . I've been here since February, decided to get a feel ... first and took the 2007 PT today. Syllabus wise I am ... Phenomenon-Hypothesis section. On the PT, I ran out of time ...
Took PT's 50-59 and 70 ... the 153 -155 range. Took PT 80 and got a 150 ... , transition from 70's PT's to PT's in the 80 ... . Bro I go to take PT 81 and I did so ... forward and Im taking the February LSAT. Not sure what to ...
... next Proctored PT will take place on **Saturday February 17 at ... sessions](https://7sage.com/series/pt-blind-review/). On Monday, ... ](https://7sage.com/event/proctored-pt-free-7/).
... Series](https://7sage.com/series/pt-blind-review/)). You can ...
... next Proctored PT will take place on **Saturday February 24 at 1 ... sessions](https://7sage.com/series/pt-blind-review/). On Monday we ... ](https://7sage.com/event/proctored-pt-free-8-2/).
< ... Series](https://7sage.com/series/pt-blind-review/)). You can take ...
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.
I took PT 46 yesterday after upgrading my ... LG, and -1 RC. On PT 50 I got annihilated on ... , -1 RC from -14 LR..). PT 51 was "in between" 50 ... LR than I did on PT 50 but not as well ... as I did on PT 46 (-6 LR).
So, what's the deal w/ effective laws? How would you approach this one, in terms of a thinking through it strategy? I chose B originally, though I understood that this was not ...