I'm confused how to write the conditional logic for this. Can somebody please explain this? When I see how the video skipped over labeling the first sentence like a premise, I got confused why he then uses it in conditional logic (TMU---> IASC)? I also ...
18. Editorialist: The positions advanced by radical environmentalists often contain hypotheses that are false and proposals that are economically infeasible. But there is a ...
When writing out the conditional logic for the reporter, I initially got /C--> /M but when I went back to review I got C---> M. In other words, because of the if I kept ...
I had this down to B or D during the timed exam, and I can't figure out what is technically wrong with B. In my mind, it's as close to a sufficient assumption as D is.
Hi!
Though I watched JY's video explanation on this question,
I cannot still figure out what is a significant difference between an answer choice (A) and (C).
I thought "cultural relationships" in (A) can entail the meaning of how ...
I watched the video explanation for this, but I don't think I understood it 100%.
I think the author's logic is simplified as farther=brighter=younger but I don't quite understand how a brighter star is supposed to be younger. Is this ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-2-question-21
Struggling so hard with why C is right and E is wrong. I didn't like either answer choice but under time pressure, chose E because thought C was challenging the premise. I've watched ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-21
We are told that Sugared beverages can be helpful in avoiding dehydration AND sugared beverages can delay muscle fatigue.
Can some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2 Q4. Specifically, things like probability or likelihood trip me up. Any resources or explanations would be appreciated! Thanks!
I have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would appreciate any comments on this particular question, ...