First sentence I diagrammed as: wind & below 84-> pleasant. The second part of this question I diagrammed as : above 84 or no wind ->oppressive. I incorrectly got answer choice (B) it has something to do the the humidity but I was able to add ...
I tried to diagram the premise in this question and I get R-->BOC. I picked an Idea "not rational" and negated it and made it the sufficient. But this is quite different from what you give in the video explanation (not BOC -->R) . What am I doing ...
Would it be possible to get some advice on this question? I'm lacking a way to do this problem methodically and quickly.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-26/
Help! I can't wrap my head around this one AT ALL. I'm not even sure what the conclusion is.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-24/
Philosopher: It is absurd to argue that people are morally obligated to act...
I am totally lost in the last sentence of this stimulus. Can anyone clarify the meaning of last sentence to me ?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47 ...
The reason why E doesn't help is because E requires us to go one more step to explain why people aren't wearing seat belts?(because they are not obeying the law?)
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-37-section-2-question-17/
I just don’t see where the author endorses anything. The author, to me, doesn't seem to reveal anything about where he/she comes down on this debate. I just can’t find one word that would do this. It seems instead, that the author is going out of his/her ...
I revisited one of my old PTs and got stuck at this question because I am not really understanding what the stimulus is saying. It's about politics and yes, I have ZERO interest in politics so it is extra hard for me to see what ...
So, what's the deal w/ effective laws? How would you approach this one, in terms of a thinking through it strategy? I chose B originally, though I understood that this was not ...