HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt7 | 75 | 79 |
| question | 29.4K | 48.9K |
| 12 | 3.1K | 3.7K |
| section | 23.4K | 38.4K |
| 1 | 27.2K | 41K |
-
Shift in LR questions PT 65 and above?I just hit PT 65 and 66 and something definitely feels different with LR. Different enough that I have seen a few point dip in my score. The ques…
... be very useful:
1. Analytics for Oversall Section Difficulty
2 ... difficulty level 1.5 compared to the other section where 1-10 had ... PT was 69, -1 in Section 1 and -3 in Section 4.
Need Advice - Falling Behind Right Before June Test DateHello! I thought I would ask the 7sage community for some advice regarding my recent PT performance. I had previously been PTing consistently in …
... . the difference in one question per section can easily throw your score ... /guess on at least one question in most sections. I wouldn ...June 2015 Experimental LR?I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. For those with the same set-up, have we been able to guess which LR was experimental? Was the one about mate/paraguay in the fi…
I am fairly certain city revenues is real. Also, many people are claiming to have a 26 question section and everyone with 2 LR says they only had 25, so if you remember a 26 question LR section, that one would have been experimental.LSAT Score - Does it Stick?The only two schools I have my sights set on (both top 30 schools) are waiting for this score to possibly admit me for the next academic year. Alth…
From reading your post, no, sounds like you are referring to a later games section that would have been real. If you had 2 lg and 1 was in section 1 then that one was experimental.Videos of Sages doing LSATsI just saw that there was a new video that showed a very good student working through an LSAT logic game in real time, with JY providing color commen…
... live commentary versions for Game 1. It's interesting to see ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-1-game-1/Re-reading Game RulesI read an article on LSAT HACKS making the case to re-read the rules 4 times as per the below guidelines: 1] To understand the game. 2] To draw. …
... time upfront on every single question because then you will not ... enough time to answer every question per section.Experimental Section QuestionsLet me start by saying I have not taken the LSAT. With that said I have some questions. -Does everyone get the same experimental type? Could john …
... you can obviously tell which section you had an extra of ... thought I did horribly on section 1, instead of letting it get ...Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Feb 2000 (PTC) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-c-section-1-game-4/
Dec 1994 (PT13) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-13-section-1-game-4/Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Oct 91 (PT3) G3:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-3/
(Personally hated this one)
Dec 92 (PT18) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-1-game-4/
(Not bad, just weird)Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-6-section-4-game-4/
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-4-section-3-game-4/
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-11-section-1-game-4/
Really ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-16-section-1-game-4/
Another ...Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-1-game-4/
(Not bad ...Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
New one to the list
Pt 39, game 2 - Really punched me straight in the face.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-1-game-2/Site Maintenance ongoing [Ended]Hey guys, 7Sage is undergoing maintenance and you may notice pages occasionally loading slowly. Since a lot of stuff is going on in the background…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-1-game-4/Reviewing Logical ReasoningHey guys! I hope preparing for the Oct. LSAT is going well for you :) I was wondering how you review for logical reasoning questions after getting th…
... a short drilling section or a full 25 question LR section. I'd ... drill or as a 5th section during PTs.Oct 2015 LR Experimental HelpI have searched around discussion boards online and it does not seem that anyone or any group of people have identified the experimental LR from the …
... same format. The first section had only 1 disagree maybe? I also ... remember an early miscellaneous in section 1. So, to narrow down here ... , do others remember a second section with 3-4 disagree?LSAT Ultimate+ Prelaunch Sale [ENDED]The LSAT Ultimate+ course is almost ready! It's not available on the normal enroll page yet. But... since you're already using 7Sage, you can pu…
... keep in mind:
1. The $50 discount will not ... +, you only get 13 months (12 original + 1 upgrade).
[Admin ... note: Ultimate+ includes 12 months, and Ultimate ...LSAT Ultimate+ Prelaunch Sale [ENDED]The LSAT Ultimate+ course is almost ready! It's not available on the normal enroll page yet. But... since you're already using 7Sage, you can pu…
... you only get 13 months (12 original + 1 upgrade).
...
Is it 1 month of the upgrade or ... just 1 additional month in total ... purchase Ultimate and in 1 month decide to upgrade, ... months left (+1) so a total of 12 months to ...Conditional Answer Choices for STRENGTHEN/WEAKENHi thanks in advance if anyone can help. How should I deal with conditional answer choices in strengthen and weaken questions. Does it matter if the …
... one is from PT 4 section 1 #13. I was able to ... one is from PT 5 Section 3 #8 where i had ...PT average of 169+ scorersHi all, I'm posting so as to ask for help in regards to how I should be interpreting my PT scores. When I take the LSAT this coming December, I'm aim…
... LG section: -10
EVERY RC section: -8
EVERY LR section: -1 to ... LG section: -0
Every RC section: -3
Every LR section: -1 to ... section: -1
Every LR section: -1
Actual: LG -0; RC -1; LR: -2, -1OCT 1991, LR2, #16 (Please help!) Why is this answer correct?Hello, I chose E and can't really understand why it is wrong whereas C is correct. Can someone please break down the logic or reasoning behind thi…
... are talking about the same question PT2/Section 4/#16 (Weaken). At ...PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
@"Dillon A. Wright" said:
Hey 7Sagers
I thought for a second Dillon had finally started studying for the LSAT for real!
I believe you still owe us some real-time logic games ... ;)Question Bank question? Video explanations?How do I get a list of all video explanations (or at least the available ones) in the question bank? When I click on the explanation it merely says "…
... currently consists of question from PTs 1-16. For those PTs, there ... for LR.
The Question Bank will be expanded to ...More than 10 point difference BR vs timed PT!Hello folks, Here it is me whining again. When I BR, I score in the 160s but when I do timed PT, I can't pass the 146-147. I did most of 7Sage's vid…
@louis2014 said:
A dumb question, do you fully understand the ... . Try to do each question in under 1 min 25 sec., but ... . When you finish, BR that question. Then watch the video. Compare ... 's anything weird about that question that doesn't sit right ...Official Dec. LSAT Discussion<font color=red>Admin's note:</font> Thread hijacking! I'm turning this thread into the Official Dec. LSAT Discussion. Here's some ground rules, take…
Wait...so those of us who had 3 LR, did we all have the same order? meaning section 1 was the experimental for all of us who had LR RC LR LR LG?Official Dec. LSAT Discussion<font color=red>Admin's note:</font> Thread hijacking! I'm turning this thread into the Official Dec. LSAT Discussion. Here's some ground rules, take…
anyone else have a 25 question LR section that began with a q about an economist (if i'm remembering correctly)?When do we get to write our names on the answer sheet?I feel like this is a really silly question, but I tried searching on Google and on the forums here and couldn't find anything... So here goes: When …
@whykaysees said:
the section 1 instructions aren't long enough ...To those who took their third retake and hit the 170s this December...Lend me your advice! I'm planning on taking the June test after having taken the June 2014 test (basically a 6 month hiatus away from the LSAT minus …
... "good" approach to each question (barring maybe 1 weird one every four ...Official Feb. LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2016 LSAT here. Here's some ground rules, taken…
@jameskalcheim I had that order, though the actual experiential sexton. might be placed differently. I think section 3 was experimental for me, section 1 was definitely realNeither nor is a biconditional?PT16-S1-G1, trying to setup the rules with conditionals and having a bit of an issue trying to figure out why Rule 3 " Neither S nor W can be added t…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-16-section-1-game-1/
In this ... video around the 1:46 mark it appears JY ...
