Could someone please help me to find where in the course I can find how to deal with "logically complete question stem". I am working on PT 59 S2 Q24 and I think I misinterpreted what was required. Are these questions MBT or MC?
Not quite sure if this is the appropriate category to ask this question, but here goes...
I just finished the "Intro to Arguments" lesson and wanted more practice, so I returned to the June 2007 Practice Test. As I went through Section 2, I ...
Wow, I did everything on this question and got sucked into answer choice E but had no idea to interpret the word "that" the way JY explained it. Are there others words that indicate "and" or sufficiency that are worth knowing?
http://7sage.com/ ...
* Premise:
- TV news watchers have NO expectations of careful discussion of public issues.
- newspaper readers have the expectation of careful discussion of public issues.
* Conclusion: In contrast to regular newspaper ...
This game was terribly difficult for me, but after spending quite a bit of time thinking about it, I think I've figured out what surely has to be the best way to set this game up. The game seems confusing because it pretends to have 5 game pieces (the five ...
This is a pseudo-sufficient assumption question.
P:All leaders in major parities oppose the bill
C:The bill will most likely fail to pass.
Target answer to connect no support with fail to pass.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-21/
This is a parallel flaw question.
Original flaw logic structure:
P1: Bank deposited credited on the same date if it is before 3 pm
P2: Alicia knows the deposit ...
The reason why E doesn't help is because E requires us to go one more step to explain why people aren't wearing seat belts?(because they are not obeying the law?)
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-37-section-2-question-17/
Can anyone help me with these types of questions? It is consistently one of these types that is the only LR question I get wrong, and I haven't been able to find a system to ...
Can someone give me some feed back on this? The reasoning denies a conclusion in order to show a premise is false. Is that an acceptable method of argumentation? I know that conditionally, if A->B, then negation B = negation A, but does that hold true ...
I chose B based on line 3~5 because I think it's the only part about "a book" mentioned in Q27, but the answer is E.
I read the passage twice again, but I still ...
I feel like i am almost there with S.A. questions.
Thank you J.Y.!
But I had some major problems diagraming the conclusion of this question.
Can someone ...