Somebody correct me if I am wrong , but there are explanations for every logic game and for logical reasoning and readingcomprehension there are explanations for PT 17 and up which has been plenty for me :).
... down anything while reading, cutting down my reading by a min ...
- I started practicing speed reading with Spreeder app, but I ... helped me start to grasp readingcomprehension passages within 2 - 3 ... on the newer tests. While reading over 40 passages, I ...
... for those questions.
For readingcomprehension, in order not to waste ... go find some dense argumentative reading online or some dense academic ...
Think of readingcomprehension as a longer logical reasoning question. The background information or opposing point may have more sentences, but the point and supporting information should be about that same (even if more fleshed out).
... . Buy the 'PowerScore's LSAT ReadingComprehension Passage Type Training'. It has ... , you become more comfortable with reading the passages, since you'll ... is improving your speed in reading. However, I think this comes ...
Like if this were a readingcomprehension passage and the question was asking me about the authors tone. I would answer something like "mild frustration" not "concerned caution" lol
that's pretty strange. you might have got sections swapped around compared to my one. my one starts : 1st SECTION (25), After readingComprehension 2nd Section (26) and after 15 minute break LR (25)
> @tekken1225 said:
>
> My friend who read these things for enjoyment over the course of years, is basically a readingcomprehension savant. Thinks RC in this test is a joke.
...
> I did the CC readingcomprehension as part of the whole ... , and I also started reading Scientific American and The Economist ... do that myself! Has reading Scientific American and the Economist ...
... ; > I did the CC readingcomprehension as part of the whole ... shebang, and I also started reading Scientific American and The Economist ... to do that myself! Has reading Scientific American and the Economist ...
I want a 170 and the thing with blind reviewing. I am writing out why I got the questions I’ve got wrong wrong, but I’m not sure if that’s even helping because I see minimal improvement, especially with readingcomprehension.