... Q') by the material implication rule. The negation is ~(~P v ... application of De Morgan’s rule and double negation). So the ... ; ~Q); but by the implication rule we get ~P v ~Q ...
... is asking for a rule replacement that still yields the ... s likely that such a rule would be identical (the ... contrapositive of the first rule) or have the exact ... possibilities as the original rule. So yes when you ... game by changing a rule, then the question is ...
Ahh logic games were so easy but I know I messed one up! I'm so mad at myself because I've done so many logic games but due to nerves I missed a rule and I got entirely a whole game wrong for sure! Ahh well there is always a next time! Good luck everyone!
... back on the more general rule of “One can be [the ... back on the more general rule and say “The President can ... just the reverse of the rule for contradicting conditional statements. You ...
... back on the more general rule of “One can be [the ... back on the more general rule and say “The President can ... just the reverse of the rule for contradicting conditional statements. You ...
Actually no... that is what BR is for... this is a process driven exam... use the right process is the best way of getting the best score... that is one of the first lessons on 7sage!
The valid argument forms and the existential quantifiers can appear anywhere on the LSAT, not only in particular types of questions. Sure, they may appear more frequently in certain types of questions, but it's not a hard and fast rule.