HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| similar | 6.7K | 7.3K |
| game | 11.7K | 23.4K |
| to | 153.9K | 566K |
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 51 | 356 | 443 |
| section | 23.4K | 38.4K |
| 4 | 14.5K | 19.8K |
| 1 | 27.2K | 41K |
-
Cambridge bites the dustJust went over to Cambridge LSAT to check on the exact composition of their bundles and looks like all the official LSAT pdf's, including the bundles…
@allison.gill.sanford
PT 41. Section 4. Passage 1. I think the LSAC was just trolling us all. -
What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... LSAT to consider a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question ... 19. While I started scrambling on this problem to ... in order for the argument to hold.
... I write this as testament to the fact that what we ... -
Chronic bubbling errorsHi all, I have an issue that is beyond frustrating. Approximately 50% of the PT's I take, I make between 1--3 bubbling errors. Obviously, this is …
This sounds like the name of a progressive Indy band. The Chronic Bubbling Errors will go on tour next week and are sure to play their #1 hit "I Had to Pee during Section 4" -
Chronic bubbling errorsHi all, I have an issue that is beyond frustrating. Approximately 50% of the PT's I take, I make between 1--3 bubbling errors. Obviously, this is …
> @LSATcantwin said:
> This sounds like the name of a progressive Indy band. The Chronic Bubbling Errors will go on tour next week and are sure to play their #1 hit "I Had to Pee during Section 4"
http://imgur.com/MtawxcX -
Chronic bubbling errorsHi all, I have an issue that is beyond frustrating. Approximately 50% of the PT's I take, I make between 1--3 bubbling errors. Obviously, this is …
I would love some feedback from 7Sagers on this LG realization I just had.I just finished going over a warm up piece from LG PT46 and had a bit of a realization during BR. I commented at the link below and I would absolutel…
... 's post on LSAT 46 - Section 4 - Game 2:
>This ... further, this process will work to my advantage. My reasoning is ... tape one, it reduces down to 7 game boards for me (using ... I took the time to figure out the game boards for J ...June 2019 BR Study Group- UPDATED!Hi Everyone: Here are the details for this study group! We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting this upcoming Sunday, February 24 fr…
> @johnjyoo said:
> Interested!
@johnjyoo Join us! We'll be doing PT 69 section 4 tonight at 7 pm. Just click the link on the original post to join.June 2019 BR Study Group- UPDATED!Hi Everyone: Here are the details for this study group! We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting this upcoming Sunday, February 24 fr…
Are you guys going to meet tomorow for PT 80 section 4? Thank you.PT Answer choice Glitch?During my last PT, there was some kind of glitch in my LR section. I was not able to see all of the answer choices and was shown only 3 answer choice…
... , I tried to reproduce your issue by taking PT 42 Section 4 with Safari ... . Unfortunately, I was still able to see ...Can you diagram "is" and "because"?I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16. Any tips highly appreciated.
I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16.
Any tips highly appreciated.pt 65 section 4 # 14Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because t…
Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because the conclusion was about unlikely that a prediction will occur where as E said probably will not? Isn't E ..."Only" Question<b></b>I'm having trouble translating "only" statements... can anyone help me out? For example: <b>Only</b> the best artworks are beautiful. (P…
... the best artworks are beautiful. (PT 49, Section 4, Question 16)
Some vs SomeHow does one distinguish between some-referring to a single person option like, (some people say the LSAT is hard) vs when a author of passage use "s…
... one distinguish between some-referring to a single person option like ... author of passage use "some" to indicate another person(s)'s ... ? This question is in context to ** LSAT 29 - Section 4 - Question 06**Some and MostYou can do: P: A some B C: A most B But you cannot do: P: A most B C: A some B Is this right? Some includes most, which is why in the …
... reference, I was confused on PT 42, Section 4, Number 22 which is ...PT3.S4.Q12 - Explanation NeededCan someone explain why the answer is E to PrepTest 3 - Section 4 - Question 12?
Can someone explain why the answer is E to
PrepTest 3 - Section 4 - Question 12?PTB.S4.Q25 - Some residents of Midville claim...Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently,…
... five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone ...PT9.S4.Q20 - Of every 100 burglar alarms police answer...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?PT3.S4.Q20 - Argument Part QuestionCan anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.
Can anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.Practicing Scored Sections (timed or untimed) but not full PTs and not just DrillsHi, I wanted to practice a section (Ex: 1 LR or 1 RC section) timed or untimed but not the full test and not just 5/10 questions of focused drills.…
... /> I wanted to practice a section (Ex: 1 LR or 1 RC section) timed or ... I can just do a section and get the score back ...Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... A, correct answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 (answered B, correct ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 ...First Batch of Accommodated Test Takers to Have an Experimental SectionSo...how did it go??? you guys have my utmost respect for sticking through this! I hope you all scored where you wanted and you kick butt in the Law …
... an experimental you have to improvise. Consequently, by ... as having to improvise for an extra section. My ... proctor was nice enough to give ... 30 extra seconds to relax after section 4, though considering ... OK on the last section though I know ...About "without" It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
PT 61, Section 4, Problem 25. And yes it ...Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.PT12.S4.Q22 - a long-term health studyHey All, So we have this health study that found that people who gained approximately 1 pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, t…
... of this, please refer to PT C2 Section 3 Question 15 (Deer ... a dissertation on this phenomena to a committee of scientists, ... this. Sometimes, I have to work wrong to right.
... continuum. "Weight gain" seems to be the superset that contains ...PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.September'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm ESTSeptember'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/CkqpoOOS0BCQU/giphy.gif We're s…
I wasn't able to fully participate due to mic issues, but I'm looking forward to the BR calls. I'm down to go over section 4 anytime between Monday and Wednesday. Thank you for organizing this! @keets993June 2019 BR Study Group- UPDATED!Hi Everyone: Here are the details for this study group! We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting this upcoming Sunday, February 24 fr…
@Alice003 We're doing PT 65, Section 4 this Thursday (3/7/19). Yes, use the same link.
PT 58 is what the March Study Group is doing today.⚖ Official November 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread ⚖Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official November 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the November …
Does anyone know PTs with a similar game to the trip to india LG? I had trouble with that one. If anyone has an approach/gameboard (three level sequencing?) to that game please let me know! Thanks!Timing ResultsI noticed that when I add up the elapsed time for each individual question of LR sections after taking a them on 7 sage (times are available under th…
Hey @"Juliet --Student Service--" It was PT 44 Section 4 (LR). Thank you for all of your help!
