... LSAT relies heavily on Formal Logic and applying a healthy dose ... of Logic to this answer dictates that ... E conflicts with the rules using Formal Logic.
... have a question regarding about conditionallogic.
I ... able to make the conditional statement from the stimulus ... have the equal meaning in conditionallogic. (some/many = 0 - 50) ... mistake in making the conditional statement from the stimulus ...
The conditionallogic here is really bugging me ... ("The law") implies a bi-conditional? That is the only way ... if it is a bi-conditional, it's not perfectly clear ... clearly been intending a bi-conditional relationship, though it still could ...
... rules? Is your understanding of conditionallogic weaker than it should be ... improvement rested upon confidence in conditionallogic, now your improvement relies on ...
... had any previous exposure to conditionallogic, except, as I realised ... good at argumentation but conditionallogic is a whole other ... should probably get back to logic games. Incidentally I notice ... proof Guide to Perfection on Logic Games." Interesting that it ...
In regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> A or B. My question is, can both A and B be in (I.e. at least one is in) or is it just either A or B, not both. Thank you!