I'm bored at lunch so I decided to ask you guys what scores do you think you earned on the June LSAT. As usual in my threads, I will go first. I think I scored a 168 because that was the the top end of my pt range recently and the test didn't seem overly difficult compared to other tests.

1

19 comments

  • Saturday, Jun 11 2016

    That's great @974, I'm sure you crushed the LSAT!

    1
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    I was averaging 171 before PT 72, then I got a little wobbly, dipping down into the 160s once I started the 170s. Average for the 70s series was 169

    1
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    Hey @974 what were your PT averages before the exam?

    0
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    HEY I CAN DO THIS NOw!!!

    I think, depending on curve and confidence errors, I probably scored between 167 and 172. But also, I've been overconfident a couple times in the 70s series so I'm trying not to get too hypheeee

    1
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    hope the september one is as easy as you people describe the june one!!! ugh though ugh. why can't i be paid to study for the lsats instead of "working" on a computer all day. ah well at least i can print logic games.

    1
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    @frielj1062129

    I don't think they've had a curve that tight for a 101 question test. Could be wrong though

    1
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    is there any chance this june's exam was a -8 or -9? i thought the material presented by LSAC was the easiest i've ever come across including all the PT's up to 77.

    1
  • Thursday, Jun 09 2016

    This is me chilling

    4
  • Thursday, Jun 09 2016

    LOL guys ... what part of "chill and take a break" did you not get? Naughty naughty!

    3
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    Here's a video that I saw that has an interesting method to score prediction:

    Obviously I'm not thinking of canceling (the main purpose of the video), but it's cool to consider the range you think you fell compared to your personal goal score and a personal "satisfying" score.

    My goal was 168+ seeing as my PT average right before the exam was 167. I think in an absolute disaster scenario I fell to 162 lowest, and in the best case I lucked into a 168.

    In the end, if it isn't your 3rd take, I think what's important is having a score that you can accept as a safety net. Underperforming to a 164 would certainly suck, but my mind will be more at ease when I write in September because I know that I have a baseline minimum. Plus I'd still be satisfied with the minor victory considering my diagnostic was mid 140s.

    Never would've expected that I'd sit for the LSAT 3 times but I'm prepared to if need be. End of self-therapy.

    3
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    +1 for your LR score this week!

    2
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    (necessary assumption: spelling performance is in some way related to RC performance). ;) @974

    1
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    Also I hate to be that guy but you spelled prediction wrong so I'm taking an extra point off your RC score ;)

    0
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    Load up the trends page and then just sort by score and count down 10 from the highest score and that will be it.

    1
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    @974 do you just go through and count?

    0
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    Super easy with 7Sage analytics!

    0
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    @974 s the highest score I have gotten at least 10

    OH I haven't done these calculations!

    0
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    Hopefully at least a 168... That was the bottom of my score range this time around and is the highest score I have gotten at least 10 times in PTs.

    1
  • Wednesday, Jun 08 2016

    I'll let you know when I finally get to take mine. *pouts*

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?