-10/-11. Would've gone -9, because of the easy 3 LG, but the last game did have six questions, as opposed to the normal five for weird games. Also, it seems LSAC is straying away from the extreme curves, both low and high, though I could be off on that.
@jhaldy10325 Powerscore’s prediction was based on: “ I estimate it based on numerous test reports I receive that evaluate difficulty. Cancels seem normal thus far, fyi.”
@danielznelson160.Sieradzki We all want me to be wrong! I could of course argue people are overemphasizing the degree of difficulty, hoping they receive a generous curve, but it could just as easily be argued that I'm unconsciously preparing for the worse and predicting a low curve as a result.
Still, I would be shocked beyond all belief if it were that high. We're in PT 72 territory at that point.
37 comments
http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0185/5092/products/persons-0027.png
@7sagestudentservices lol jk u right
@jhaldy10325 DON'T SAY THAT
THAT WASN'T ME
@jhaldy10325 thats a cruel, cruel thing to say/dream about. worst nightmare i have ever heard of
And how accurate has Spivey been in the past?
It's not that we hate you @danielznelson160 . It's that your reasoning makes us confused and scared, lol.
@1633 its on Spivey's Twitter. I already tweeted him. Stay tuned for updates.
His twitter
I just dreamed it @1633 . @danielznelson160 is the one saying it for real real.
-10/-11. Would've gone -9, because of the easy 3 LG, but the last game did have six questions, as opposed to the normal five for weird games. Also, it seems LSAC is straying away from the extreme curves, both low and high, though I could be off on that.
-15 lol
Cool, thanks for that @yimei438 !
@jhaldy10325 Powerscore’s prediction was based on: “ I estimate it based on numerous test reports I receive that evaluate difficulty. Cancels seem normal thus far, fyi.”
https://twitter.com/DaveKilloran/status/782119806623375360
Idk much about the curve but this is great news. Means my score will be even higher. Scholarships await
@jhaldy10325
Please don't hate me, everyone!
http://25.media.tumblr.com/e16c9944294abfb9f38bc46629cf9413/tumblr_mz7ybdPPuK1sv6zdro6_r1_250.gif
@brittanycourville573 where can I find the Spivey article?
Spivey said -13 and Killoran said -12, so that has to be a good sign
See, this is what I'm talking about!
-13/-14. They gave 71 a -14 curve and I didn't even feel it was that difficult.
79 felt like they took the RC of 78 and LG of 77 and put them together along with an insanely tough LR2. LR1 was alright (3/5 on the difficulty scale)
@7sagestudentservices DON'T SAY THAT
I had a dream last night that it was -9, lol.
@danielznelson160.Sieradzki We all want me to be wrong! I could of course argue people are overemphasizing the degree of difficulty, hoping they receive a generous curve, but it could just as easily be argued that I'm unconsciously preparing for the worse and predicting a low curve as a result.
Still, I would be shocked beyond all belief if it were that high. We're in PT 72 territory at that point.
Let's hope I'm way off on this one.
-13 seems fair
@8096 Yes, but the curve is pre-determined based on when the September test was given as an experimental in past LSAT administrations
Yea. LSAT score is based on your percentile among the test-takers