27 comments

  • Thursday, Oct 27 2016

    @combsni116

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723

    it is luck , considering that certain tests exploit certain weaknesses. So if I take an exam that literally plays to all of my strengths, I had nothing to do with the composition of the exam. Wouldn't you call that a matter of luck ?

    Did you read my whole comment? I describe what you're talking about and refer to that as the "luck."

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723

    The luck is whether or not you get a test that exploits your weaknesses or not.

    So like @twssmith644 says above,

    @twssmith644 if you are prepared, then it isn't a matter of luck. If you aren't thoroughly prepared and write the test then you are willing to spin the roulette wheel to "hope" that you get lucky.

    I think that is the perfect way to put it, @twssmith644 !

    @combsni116, luck is something that is really metaphysical and hard to define. I guess I should have elaborated before, but the point of my OP was to make sure LSATers stave off the idea of learned helplessness, whereby one develops a sense of powerlessness over the test. Once you start assigning luck to any part of the test, problems are bound to arise. If you start attributing when you do bad to bad luck, your brain will begin to fall in to the pattern of thinking that good tests are just good luck. See the issue there? I think it is best to forget luck all together. A real man makes his own luck! :)

    Besides, if you get a test that plays to ALL your strengths and NONE of your weaknesses as you say, then that isn't luck; that is straight up divine intervention, haha!

    0
  • Thursday, Oct 27 2016

    Yes, certain tests can flip-flop on what is challenging depending on strengths/weaknesses, but imo I think that the order of the sections on Test day can play an added extra layer of "luck". There are some that the experimental was so hard earlier in their test sequence that it rattled them to the point is was hard to recover.

    Edited to add:

    @combsni116

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723

    it is luck , considering that certain tests exploit certain weaknesses.

    I agree with Alex that if you are prepared, then it isn't a matter of luck. If you aren't thoroughly prepared and write the test then you are willing to spin the roulette wheel to "hope" that you get lucky.

    @combsni116 an exam that literally plays to all of my strengths

    Then you prepared the best you could in those areas, but I have rarely heard of someone lucking into a score in the 170+. This discussion is really irrelevant unless you discuss what score band you are identifying.

    1
  • Thursday, Oct 27 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 it is luck , considering that certain tests exploit certain weaknesses. So if I take an exam that literally plays to all of my strengths, I had nothing to do with the composition of the exam. Wouldn't you call that a matter of luck ?

    0
  • Wednesday, Oct 26 2016

    ( phenomenon block quote )@katherinethanos118.t At this point, the LSAT feels more luck of the draw than anything else

    (/phenomenon )

    I hear ya! But that is the phenomenon known as learned helplessness taking hold. Even if it feels like luck, you have to remember it is not. The luck is whether or not you get a test that exploits your weaknesses or not. In order to avoid this, one must make sure they have covered all bases and have no weaknesses.

    0
  • Wednesday, Oct 26 2016

    I actually scored better in June than I did in September... after 2 extra months of full time studying and another 15 PTs... At this point, the LSAT feels more luck of the draw than anything else

    0
  • Wednesday, Oct 26 2016

    I don't think the test is getting harder, but I do believe test anxiety is a real thing. Taking practice exams and getting the same score over and over again can make you complement. Then when you take the real thing and encounter something slightly unusual, you get tripped up. On my previous six PT: 69, 70, 76, 77, 78, I scored within one or two points on all of them, so I had an average with very low variability. Yet scored -15 from my average on the September test. What threw me off was the first experimental games section. They were weird, and when the section is first, you don't know if you're gonna have another chance. Therefore, I took the rest of the test with so many jitters thinking I already got enough questions wrong in one section to drop me below my ideal score, and just couldn't think straight for the rest of the test. I got two entire games wrong yet re did them without answers and got them fully right within six minutes each. Anxiety is real, and I am thinking about taking a beta blocker for December to calm my nerves.

    0
  • Wednesday, Oct 26 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 Supp :D

    1
  • Wednesday, Oct 26 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 I hope your tinnitus gets better :(

    Lol I am learning to hum on one pitch with harmony on the other to make it fun:)

    1
  • Wednesday, Oct 26 2016

    @twssmith644

    Side note - My test site had "noise reducing fans" spread throughout our test room to drown out random noises like pencil tapping, etc by the other test takers. I really appreciated that to have a low pitch hum to drown out minor noises - Not sure if that would help your situation but something to maybe check on?

    Oh Yes! That is actually an amazing thing to look into to! I use Bose QC15 noise cancelling headphones when I study during the day because the noise in the city never stops, haha.

    Thanks again and I hope your tinnitus gets better :(

    1
  • Wednesday, Oct 26 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 because I am someone who needs extreme quiet to concentrate at high levels, especially for things like logic games!

    Side note - My test site had "noise reducing fans" spread throughout our test room to drown out random noises like pencil tapping, etc by the other test takers. I really appreciated that to have a low pitch hum to drown out minor noises - Not sure if that would help your situation but something to maybe check on? I was diagnosed with Tinnitus last week with ringing of two different pitches in each ear and I know that having those noise reducing fans really helped me. Or maybe a constant drone of humming would be more distracting? Something to check on because my room was concrete and every noise would have echoed.

    1
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    @twssmith644 Because Eileen Gray gave everyone a virus

    Ayeee ! Mikey!!

    0
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 I am with you, to an extant. I always make sure there is noise in the background, when taking a PT. I am worried that test 80 will carry all of my weaknesses but it could also carry my strengths

    0
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    Honestly I think the inspiring quote below is really important for us former September takers and future December takers to keep in mind

    1
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    Amen @twssmith644

    0
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    Because Eileen Gray gave everyone a virus

    5
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    @combsni116

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723

    my 70's have been a bit lower but I think the 50's were much worse

    That's awesome, haha! Now you know the 70s aren't harder at all, perhaps just a tad bit different! Consider yourself fortunate because I can't tell you how many people tell me their scores dropped 3-5 points when first hitting the 70s.

    1
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    @twssmith644 ,

    Haha! I wish I was too, believe me. All I have are the funny stories people who were in on it like you tell me, lol!

    @twssmith644 Love this Alex! Nerves, weaknesses exposed, not PTing in real time situations before test day, issues at a bad test site, all of it adds up to the score you scored on that da

    Also, so, so much this! Things like weaknesses being exposes and not PT'ing in test day conditions is the bane of many LSATers. I think addressing this is going to be one of my biggest challenges just because I am someone who needs extreme quiet to concentrate at high levels, especially for things like logic games!

    0
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 Simply put, there are a ton of reasons people score lower on the real test.

    Love this Alex! Nerves, weaknesses exposed, not PTing in real time situations before test day, issues at a bad test site, all of it adds up to the score you scored on that day.

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 I think the topic of whether the test is getting harder has been discussed nearly ad nauseam at this point, and I think the consensus is that it isn't harder per say, but it is different.

    Wish you could have been on Calls with Nicole Hopkins trying to emphasize the point that you made - it is a test, always testing the same skills and given the parameters of LSAC's objectives to not make the test subjective, the test in its' current format will have slight shifts because of the elevation of test prep companies, i.e. 7Sage:) Huge kudos for your tact because Nicole would lay it on the line verbally on those calls and while not X rated, they were not PG:)

    1
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 my 70's have been a bit lower but I think the 50's were much worse

    0
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    I think I was simply overconfident. Case closed!

    0
  • Tuesday, Oct 25 2016

    @combsni116 do we think that such a large portion suffers from true anxiety? I've been a baseball pitcher for a pretty long time and sometimes I have had to convince myself that it was just a practice session and to throw strikes like such. It's always eliminated any nerves that I have had. I also don't suffer from true anxiety

    I don't know the percentages or # of people that take the LSAT with anxiety every year. I'm sure a lot of people are just simply nervous and that throws them off. Sometimes people just don't perform well under pressure.

    Also, I think a lot of people just overestimate themselves and their LSAT preparedness level based on an insufficient number of PTs.

    Simply put, there are a ton of reasons people score lower on the real test. The newer tests being a bit different than the older ones certainly played a part.

    0
  • Monday, Oct 24 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 and @bjphillips5431 , do we think that such a large portion suffers from true anxiety? I've been a baseball pitcher for a pretty long time and sometimes I have had to convince myself that it was just a practice session and to throw strikes like such. It's always eliminated any nerves that I have had. I also don't suffer from true anxiety

    0
  • Monday, Oct 24 2016

    @combsni116

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723

    if nerves are such an issue, couldn't one just drop the anxiety? Treat it like a practice test and realize that there is another test

    Yeah, like @bjphillips5431 says, it isn't that easy. I have GAD (generalized-anxiety disorder) and I take meds and stuff when needed. The thing is if anxiety was something you could control and "just drop" it wouldn't be true anxiety by definition.

    2
  • Monday, Oct 24 2016

    @combsni116 No. As much as I wish that were true, you can't trick your mind or nervous system into something that is objectively false (at least not easily). As someone who has dealt with nerves or anxiety my whole life, you cannot just drop it. It sucks, but you have to learn how handle it.

    4
  • Monday, Oct 24 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 if nerves are such an issue, couldn't one just drop the anxiety? Treat it like a practice test and realize that there is another test

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?