I took a break to study for the LSAT and I did not do that well on the LSAT so I would rather not say that.

On job applications I just wrote that my part time job conflicted with my school schedule so I had to quit to finish my undergrad on time. I started a new job as soon as I graduated. (my work break was from August - July).

As I finished my undergrad in 4 years, its pretty clear that I was in school full time, so I think it's kind of a given that I wasn't just f*cking around for 11 months and I don't need to explain it? or should I explain just in case?

0

7 comments

  • Sunday, Dec 10 2017

    Don't explain it. That would just draw attention to it. If you are asked in an interview, the class schedule reason or even just studying for the LSAT works.

    0
  • Sunday, Dec 10 2017

    As everyone said, you're fine. The fact you worked at all and have some WE will be a nice soft though!

    1
  • Saturday, Dec 09 2017

    No I don't think you do.

    I don't think working during the school year is expected from any law schools.

    You're technically a "full-time student."

    0
  • Saturday, Dec 09 2017

    thanks ya'll i've really been overthinking every tiny thing in my apps

    0
  • Saturday, Dec 09 2017

    nah you should be fine

    1
  • Saturday, Dec 09 2017

    No you should be fine. You only need to explain long periods that you were not working and also not in school. You should be doing something full time, or part time at least. Many people don’t work during school when going full time.

    1
  • Saturday, Dec 09 2017

    Were you active in any other groups or clubs in school? I tried to do the school/work/study for LSAT combo and failed twice so I know what you mean. The main thing is that you are doing something with your time; that is what admissions is looking for.

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?