18 comments

  • Thursday, Oct 09

    Getting ready for my second LSAT, came back here because I'm struggling on these questions in PTs. Just a reminder that yall got this!

    9
  • Thursday, Sep 25

    Mr. Fat Cat the best recurring character on 7sage?

    11
  • Wednesday, Jun 18

    love that these sections are always listed as like 5 minutes these times were clearlyyy not decided by someone reading and taking notes

    29
  • Thursday, Jun 05

    I would find videos helpful for these sections #feedback

    19
  • Friday, Apr 25

    Please can somebody tell me where we can find a list of the acronyms?? If can't recall what RRE means then I cannot understand this section.

    3
  • Friday, Apr 25

    OMG these TLAs drive me crazy. Please write out acronyms in full at first useage in each section.

    15
  • Thursday, Jan 09

    I like the idea that we are only looking for an alternative hypothesis that disproves the original (for causal realtionships), it makes so much sense to see it that way. I thought that I had to use the same method from the strengthen.

    4
  • Thursday, Dec 05 2024

    Alrighty. I think this is probably going to be a weaker section for me [pun not intended lol], but I might be wrong.

    Here's what I'm gathering from memory for a summary:

    WSE (Weaken, Strengthen, Evaluate) questions are like RRE (Resolve, Reconcile, Explain) in that we must treat all of the answer choices as true. We are given a set of premises that we also must treat as true, just like RRE. However, the hypothesis, otherwise known as a conclusion here, must be treated with suspicion, as it is not invariably proven true by the premises provided in the stimulus. Our job here, depending upon if it is a weaken or strengthen question, must find one of these "true" answers and determine which one MOST weakens or strengthens the premises and their relationship to (support given) vis-a-vis the conclusion.

    I am not sure yet what type of question the Evaluate in WSE means. Maybe it's for a later lesson.

    Premises: true

    Conclusion: treat with suspicion (not proven)

    Answer choices: all true (one is the best fit)

    12
  • Saturday, Jun 01 2024

    Justice for Mr. Fat Cat NOW

    1 like = 1 donation to his legal defense fund

    309
  • Sunday, Apr 28 2024

    S - Which one of the following, if true, lends the most support to the psychologist’s hypothesis?

    Wouldn't this be a MSS question type and not a WSE question type ?

    2
  • Friday, Jan 12 2024

    I'm confident that Big Dog is innocent, your honor.

    62
  • Sunday, Nov 12 2023

    Is there a list somewhere on 7Sage that has all the LR question-type strategies laid out together?

    0
  • Saturday, Jul 08 2023

    BIG DOG <3!

    8

Confirm action

Are you sure?