ty! :3

Omg I'm finally understanding "sufficient" when looking at answers! I noticed A vs B that one was flipping which was the sufficient and which was the necessity. yay.

From reading 7Sage forums, I've found there's good LR explanations from LSATHacks, PowerScore, and Manhattan Prep should you need some more explanation (:

I agree. When he mentioned this was a question from the bar exam, I got more motivated in my studies #feedback

thanks. good point.

#feedback is JY able to respond to this so we can have some clarity?

vibes

I agree I've been seeing these as much easier. It helps boost my confidence back up after the previous section 😅

#feedback do you recommend we still watch all explanations if we got the question right?

#feedback can you link "WSE lessons" so I can get a quick recap?

I say yes.

This was an easy one for me, maybe it was because I focused on the conclusion and nothing else? I was able to hunt the answer.

#help Even when I feel "quick" i still go over the target time. How do you get better with speed?

Please use headphones.

sincerely,

everyone else in public.

i keep getting these wrong :(

#help

go through all the motions if you are not getting answers correct. The diagrams are to help you with the correct thinking-process. Eventually it will be second nature by setting up the habit.

I chose C not because of the age-range - as you can argue 40-60 year olds could be first-years, and the phenomenon does not specify anyone's age.

Instead, I knew it was the correct answer because it was saying the opposite of what the conclusion was saying.

I disagree with JY that that was an unreasonable assumption, as sometimes we throw away correct answers because of instant reactions like that, and not reading the prompt in full (e.g. I almost chose B because of the word "moderate levels" and seeing that as irrelevant to the discussion).

no that's my go-to strategy (for the time-being). I recommend spreeder if you just need to read/process faster.

this was my thought at first, but then after comparing it to my second choice, I understood it was a possibility for something "eradicated" to come back.

6:18 in the video. research project does not equal the subset of alternate-energy initiatives.

Again, if you're unsure you can POE, and see this one most strengthens the argument that large corporations are impacting the government's funding decisions.

Does it make more sense now?

I chose C because I didn't focus on the grammar "of the interviews shown" and instead focused on why the TV was unbiased (the opposite of the claimed conclusion) - which not enough information is given to prove that. I was focused on destroying the conclusion and not just weakening it.

Is there a list somewhere on 7Sage that has all the LR question-type strategies laid out together?

maybe you're overthinking the "easy" questions?

correct answers will let you make reasonable assumptions. Wrong answers will let you make out-of-reach assumptions.