I just totally ignored the middle sentence, since I noticed "accelerated" in the first and last sentence to form a connection.

So is the strategy for these questions to not look at the answers first, and "guess" what the right answer is ? #help#feedback

#help Even when I feel "quick" i still go over the target time. How do you get better with speed?

Omg I'm finally understanding "sufficient" when looking at answers! I noticed A vs B that one was flipping which was the sufficient and which was the necessity. yay.

i keep getting these wrong :(

I chose C not because of the age-range - as you can argue 40-60 year olds could be first-years, and the phenomenon does not specify anyone's age.

Instead, I knew it was the correct answer because it was saying the opposite of what the conclusion was saying.

I disagree with JY that that was an unreasonable assumption, as sometimes we throw away correct answers because of instant reactions like that, and not reading the prompt in full (e.g. I almost chose B because of the word "moderate levels" and seeing that as irrelevant to the discussion).

#feedback do you recommend we still watch all explanations if we got the question right?

#feedback can you link "WSE lessons" so I can get a quick recap?

I chose C because I didn't focus on the grammar "of the interviews shown" and instead focused on why the TV was unbiased (the opposite of the claimed conclusion) - which not enough information is given to prove that. I was focused on destroying the conclusion and not just weakening it.

Is there a list somewhere on 7Sage that has all the LR question-type strategies laid out together?

I chose A bc I accepted the scientists didn't do a good job and were dumb.... sorry scientists...

now that the test is digital, and we can't "circle" answers, how would we handle "circling" 4 correct choices and not the 1 incorrect one, when faced with an EXCEPT question?#feedback#help

I'm now starting to get it - I think what helped was not getting too sucked into the discrepancy and just understanding what it was that I needed the answer to. It made E that much more obvious.

I was between C and D but chose C because it included the comparison of those who did not stop eating red meat, while D I saw as an assumption would have to be made with the answer in order for it to work (did not mention explicitly those who still eat red meat).

I chose A because I thought it was a good explanation - by adding the the assumption it would correlate with the blackouts.

This was an easy one for me, maybe it was because I focused on the conclusion and nothing else? I was able to hunt the answer.

I chose D because my explanation to the paradox was my own knowledge that sharks grow several sets of teeth in their lifetime - thus ignoring all the red flags with that answer choice.

I've never heard someone pronounce algae like that.

I'm getting all these wrong. Whoo hoo! lol Will come back to these once I have a better grasp at LR.

I overlooked the "Most" and "and" in the first sentence, and didn't mark "disease-free" as a "most" womp womp

I got it wrong and chose B, because I just saw the last sentence as a throwaway sentence that the test-makers put in to throw us off (i.e. we didn't have enough information to make sense of the last sentence/they were hiding information from us to explain the last sentence).

Will this situation ever happen in the LSAT?

#help#feedback

This took me much longer than usual to figure out, but I got the right answer!

#help I chose D because I assumed "virulent" meant the same as resistant. I also made the assumption over B :(

I want to give my own example, but it feels I may be straying myself the wrong way if 1) I give a bad example or 2) read someone's else's example that is wrong. I wish JY and his team replied and commented to people's comments more, to make sure we are all on the same page. #feedback.

#feedback is there any guide to what difficulty we should choose (i.e. the percentage of expected incorrect is under 50%, 40%, etc.)?