3/2 Next time if I don't know an answer I am right away choosing E
This question has me clueless, I thought the opposing view was the conclusion - And answer E I can not even understand or make sense of what it means
At this point if I have no clue what the answer is I am choosing E regarding of any inference. The explanation did help in someway
I'm printing this tomorrow at work, and will take it everywhere with me is my new bible lol with all due respect
Ok I first said E was the answer, and then in the blind review I said B, but ok it makes sense that the one who weakeness most is B because is saying that the reason why the kids are performing better is because their parents are educators (which is an alternative hypotheses to the conclusion)
and E is just saying some (which could be 1 or all according to previous lessons) children who don't participate in the program did good in school, that is not an alternative hypothesis, it's just extra information
right?
Ok I got it right, but I have a different reasoning on how I got it
I saw it as:
Casual Argument:
Decline in n. of NGO correlates with growth or increase of governement services
Conclusion
the Increase of Governement Services correlates with decrease in voluntareerism
Answer: alternate explaination to the correlation cited in casual argument
I got it right, but I don't understand how he got the same answer with a different reasoning
I got home from reviewing demands and medical records to come and read! ughhh where are the videos!!
I rather watch the videos, understanding this by my own feels like I am not paying for the course and I am learning with examples that Chat GPT could give =(
Help!
When I read the example it makes total sense but I don't know how he got to that mapping can someone help me? (Only birds migrate south in winder example)
I'm still stuck and afraid but at least not as frustrated as the beggining I feel that I've learned some things, still a little afraid of taking the LSAT drills or prep questions but I feel a little better, maybe because it feels like I've learned some stuff
@JoannaClohessy I saw a recorded class today with Ms. Mcduffy, and honestly I noticed that reading helps me better than doing the whole symbol and negations -- I feel like he confuses me a lot as well, so I'll just use his knowledge when I cannot get the answer by my own logic
So, what I understand is that when negating the whole conditional claims we negate the second section or the necessary condition, and for all we use some and negate B?
This guy keeps on confusing me instead of making things clearer for me
I wonder where he is going with this lesson
@SadieIgoe I am finding myself in the same position but yes ma'am finally!
I just looked at the conditional indicators and for question 3 Only is a necessary condition not suffieicient, can someone clarify I am not understanding why they are using it in the example as suffiencient when only is necessary
@DannySmall Please!!! I feel that I am getting better but I really need to fully understand it! I am super interested as well
@SebastianE =( I just realized that the reason why I am having so many issues with Conditional Reasoning is because it is one of the hardest sections in the LSAT for me!!!!! I just don't know how to map it right, but I will map it and I will do the counterpositive to see if I get the right answer, all of the answers look right to me!!! and is so sad and frustrating!!!
I honestly feel that instead of helping me is dragging me down! I've only taking this course for like a week, I had a 145 LSAC Prep course before taking it, so I went to the LSAC website and learned from there, I decided to pay for a private course like this one and I feel like is not helping whatsoever! so I'm like super frustrated at this point
I really feel like this prep course is confusing me more than helping me, I literally took almost a whole week of lessons to take an LSAT question and get it wrong, like is this course really going to help it feels more of like a scam at this point, and the guy! Jesus Christ he goes 1000 miles per hour when explaining anything!!!
I'm afraid, I'm freaking out let see how it goes